arXiv AI By Abdulhady Abas Abdullah, Erik Cambria, Milena Zivkovic

Neurosymbolic Alignment for Physiologically-Safe Clinical Language Models

Read the original on arXiv AI →

Neurosymbolic Alignment couples a 7B clinical language model with a graph‑based physiological world model to score candidate responses using homeostatic constraints, multi‑hop plausibility, and drug‑interaction penalties. This training‑time framework drives iterative on‑policy updates and achieves a 90.8% Clinical Safety Score on the CSB benchmark, outperforming ORPO, GPT‑4 (5‑shot), and a self‑correction pipeline. Ablation studies show that the HGNN scoring and iterative training are the key contributors to the safety gains.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 5

Preferred, Not Safer: Pairwise Preference Is a Poor Proxy for Clinical Safety

arXiv:2608. 02617v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We evaluate whether clinician pairwise preferences provide a reliable signal of clinical safety in large language model (LLM) evaluation using expert feedback from MOOVE (Massive Open Online Validation and Evaluation), a clinician-led platform collecting blinded pairwise preferences alongside multi-criterion rubric ratings.

By Fay Elhassan, David Sasu, Alexandra Kulinkina, Lars Henning Klein, Mary-Anne Hartley
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22

The Effect of Quantization on Clinical Benchmarks: Accuracy and Safety Across Model Families

The study evaluates how quantization affects accuracy and safety of five 7‑8B language models on clinical benchmarks. INT8 GPTQ shows minimal degradation (≤1.9%) across tasks, while INT4 causes substantial, model‑dependent drops, especially in high‑risk scenarios and safety metrics. Recovery methods such as clinical calibration substitution and QLoRA fine‑tuning yield mixed results, underscoring the need for task‑specific validation.

By Leonard Twagirayezu, Prasenjit Mitra
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

Retrieval-Augmented Agentic Rubric Generation for Reliable Medical Response Evaluation

The paper introduces a retrieval‑augmented multi‑agent framework that automatically generates instance‑specific evaluation rubrics for medical language models. By retrieving authoritative medical evidence, decomposing it into atomic facts, and combining these with user interaction constraints, the system produces fine‑grained criteria that outperform GPT‑4o on HealthBench and LLMEval‑Med. The generated rubrics also guide response refinement, improving medical LLM output quality by 9.2%.

By Yinzhu Chen, Abdine Maiga, Hossein A. Rahmani, Emine Yilmaz
arXiv AI
Jul 24

A Knowledge-Injection Framework for Zero-Shot Adaptation of LLMs to Delirium Prediction

arXiv:2607. 20453v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models show promise for clinical prediction, but zero-shot performance on specialized tasks is limited by incomplete domain knowledge, especially for smaller locally deployable models.

By Jessica Sena, Shesadree Priyadarshani, Miguel Contreras, Bharat Gandhi, Scott Siegel, Subhash Nerella, Parisa Rashidi