arXiv:2608. 19957v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Natural language code retrieval is a rapidly evolving task in computer science.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.
arXiv:2607. 26766v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Code search in large-scale ecosystems is often hindered by the lexical gap between user queries and implementation details, alongside the trade-off between the low latency of traditional Information Retrieval (IR) and the precision of Deep Learning (DL).
arXiv:2609.38630v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Privacy redaction must remove personal information while preserving relationships expressed in text. We develop a multilingual named-entity tagger with...
Code search in large-scale ecosystems is often hindered by the lexical gap between user queries and implementation details, alongside the trade-off between the low latency of traditional Information Retrieval (IR) and the precision of Deep Learning (DL). We present MediaWiki Code2Code Search, a neural retrieval system for semantic code-to-code discovery.
ExecRetrieval is a new benchmark for code‑embedding retrieval that contains 939 Python tasks, each with a verified correct implementation and up to four single‑edit buggy distractors generated mechanically. The dataset allows direct testing of a retriever’s ability to functionally discriminate correct code from near‑clone incorrect code, rather than relying on lexical similarity. Experiments on 23 dense embeddings and BM25 show that while the best system can retrieve the correct code within the top 10 results, it often fails to rank the correct implementation first, with rank‑1 errors dominated by paired buggy variants.
arXiv:2506. 11066v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Code retrieval is essential in modern software development, as it boosts code reuse and accelerates debugging.
The paper introduces a three‑stage training pipeline that builds compact, efficient dense retrievers without requiring ground‑truth relevance labels. Using cross‑lingual alignment, relational knowledge distillation, and contrastive fine‑tuning, the authors develop PolDense (six Polish models ranging from 17 M to 1 B parameters) and EuroDense (a 435 M‑parameter model covering nine European languages). Extensive evaluation on 41 Polish and 150 multilingual tasks shows that PolDense‑1B outperforms larger retrievers up to 9 B parameters, while EuroDense leads in task‑averaged and language‑averaged performance among models below 1 B parameters.