arXiv AI By Dan Barry, Andrew Hines

Mutable Transcripts: Mitigating Context Pollution through Editable Conversation State

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces mutable transcripts, an interaction paradigm that lets users edit prior turns in a chat, turning the conversation history into an editable state rather than a fixed record. A prototype was built and tested with 17 participants, who preferred mutable transcripts over standard chat for clarity, confidence, and ease of use, and reported less need to restart conversations. Analysis of user study transcripts shows that mutable transcripts can shorten conversations and remove outdated context, suggesting that user-driven revisions improve interaction quality.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 12

Do LLMs Benefit From Their Own Words?

arXiv:2602. 24287v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In multi-turn conversations, large language models typically condition on the full conversation history: both past user prompts and assistant responses.

By Jenny Y. Huang, Leshem Choshen, Wei Sun, Omar Khattab, Ram\'on Fernandez Astudillo, Mehul Damani, Tamara Broderick, Jacob Andreas
arXiv AI
Sep 11

PRAGMA: Evaluating Personalized Guidance with Memory Alignment in Lifelong Conversations

PRAGMA is a benchmark designed to evaluate personalized guidance in long‑term conversations. It includes curated longitudinal conversation histories, evidence annotations, and guidance scenarios that reflect evolving user contexts and incorrect assumptions. Experiments show that current retrieval, memory, and long‑context models struggle to recover relevant conversational evidence and to use it effectively for personalized guidance.

By Hyojeong Yu, Hyukhun Koh, Minsung Kim, Yunah Jang, Kyomin Jung
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 18

Towards Proactive Detection of User-Side Implicit Conflicts in Human-LLM Dialogue

The paper introduces UC-Bench, a human‑annotated benchmark for detecting user‑side implicit conflicts in Human‑LLM dialogue, a problem largely overlooked compared to LLM‑side conflicts. Experiments show current LLMs struggle with these conflicts, especially when they stem from implicit incompatibilities in dialogue history. To address this, the authors propose SynUC, a constraint‑guided data synthesis method that generates a new training set, UC‑Data, which improves performance of lightweight LLMs on UC‑Bench compared to larger general‑purpose models and existing synthesis approaches.

By Jinqiang Wang, Tao Zhu, Huansheng Ning