arXiv Statistics ML
Multi-fidelity batch Bayesian optimization for bioprocess development across scales
Read the original on arXiv Statistics ML →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Statistics ML.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
2d ago
Reduced-Space Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization of Process Simulation Models
arXiv:2609.17440v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Optimizing industrial process flowsheets is often computationally prohibitive due to the high cost of rigorous simulations and the curse of dimensional...
Hugging Face Trending Papers
2d ago
Reduced-Space Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization of Process Simulation Models
Optimizing industrial process flowsheets is often computationally prohibitive due to the high cost of rigorous simulations and the curse of dimensionality inherent in complex design spaces. To address...
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 26
Bayesian Optimization for General Reaction Conditions
arXiv:2502. 18966v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: General chemical reaction conditions that achieve consistently high performance across multiple substrates are important for practical applications such as library synthesis and high-throughput experimentation.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 17
A Human-in-the-Loop Bayesian Optimization Framework for Constraint-Aware Bioprocess Development
This work presents an extension to Pareto Front Guided Sampling (PFGS), a Human-in-the-Loop (HitL) Bayesian Optimization (BO) framework in which Gaussian process (GP) surrogate-derived quantities are reformulated as objectives of a multi-objective optimization problem, and the resulting Pareto front is exposed to a domain expert for interactive candidate selection rather than returning a single automated recommendation. The framework is extended in two directions: constrained optimization is addressed by incorporating the posterior probability of satisfying output specification limits as an explicit Pareto objective, computed analytically from the GP posterior distribution; robust optimization is addressed by a Monte Carlo sampling strategy that estimates expected lower-confidence performance over a user-defined variability of input perturbations, capturing performance degradation under likely implementation deviations.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 18
A Human-in-the-Loop Bayesian Optimization Framework for Constraint-Aware Bioprocess Development
arXiv:2606. 19230v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This work presents an extension to Pareto Front Guided Sampling (PFGS), a Human-in-the-Loop (HitL) Bayesian Optimization (BO) framework in which Gaussian process (GP) surrogate-derived quantities are reformulated as objectives of a multi-objective optimization problem, and the resulting Pareto front is exposed to a domain expert for interactive candidate selection rather than returning a single automated recommendation.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 28
Transfer Learning Architectures for Scalable Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization
arXiv:2607. 23404v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-driving laboratories increasingly rely on multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization (MFBO) to balance cheap, approximate evaluations against scarce, expensive ones, with a predictive surrogate at its core.