arXiv AI By Shaokang Jiang, Daye Nam

Motif: Discovering and Automating Personal Web Workflows

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 10531v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in LLMs and existing work on programming by demonstration have made it possible for end users to create automations by explicitly demonstrating their behavior to LLMs.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 21

AutoRecLab: Describe the Experiment, Get the Code!

AutoRecLab is a Python-based autonomous laboratory for recommender‑system research that transforms natural‑language prompts into executable experiments. It automatically derives experiment requirements, builds and validates prototypes, and iteratively expands them into full studies using retrieval‑augmented generation, static type verification, and execution‑steered tree search. In a demonstration, AutoRecLab autonomously conducted an explicit‑to‑implicit feedback conversion study, achieving 8 of 9 successful runs at an average cost of about $1 per run with GPT‑5.4‑mini.

By Moritz Baumgart, Philipp Meister, Justus Krell, Michael Schmidt, Bela Gipp, Joeran Beel
arXiv AI
Oct 31

UPPAAi: Towards LLM-Assisted Modeling, Verification, Analysis and Synthesis

UPPAAI extends the UPPAAL tool by integrating large language models (LLMs) to assist users in constructing, explaining, debugging, and specifying models through dialogue. The system follows a workflow where the user requests, the LLM proposes and explains, and UPPAAL performs verification, exposing its editor, queries, and verifier via a Tools API. Seven case studies demonstrate UPPAAI’s effectiveness across timed automata, stochastic hybrid automata, and strategy learning, showing that LLMs not only generate solutions but also proactively suggest relevant UPPAAL features.

By Peter Dolog, Kim G. Larsen, Marius Miku\v{c}ionis, Frederik F. K. Rasmussen
arXiv AI
Oct 31

Do Personalized Skills Help Coding Agents? An Empirical Study of Developer Interaction Traces

The paper investigates whether tailoring coding agent skills to individual developers improves collaboration. It introduces a framework that bootstraps rule‑based skills and refines them with LLMs to capture developer‑specific preferences, and evaluates this approach using an interactive replay system with a simulated developer. Experiments on real interaction logs show that while task‑specific skills generally perform best, personalized skills become more effective when developers frequently express consistent preferences, especially on related tasks.

By Shuyan Huang, Kai Du, Andrew Lan