arXiv Machine Learning By Sudhanva Manjunath Athreya, Sai Phani Kumar Malladi

More Accurate, Less Human: Gestalt Grouping in Vision Models

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2608. 10195v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Human vision organizes what it sees into wholes: same-colored points group into series, similar marks cohere into categories, and shapes complete into recognizable objects.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Aug 20

When to Call an Apple Red: Humans Follow Introspective Rules, VLMs Don't

The paper introduces the Graded Color Attribution (GCA) dataset, a benchmark that tests whether Vision‑Language Models (VLMs) and humans can articulate and follow a threshold rule for labeling objects by color. In experiments, humans consistently adhere to their stated rules, while VLMs—despite accurately estimating color coverage—often violate their own introspective rules, especially when world‑knowledge priors are present. This discrepancy highlights a miscalibration in VLM self‑knowledge that differs from human cognition.

By Jonathan Nemitz, Carsten Eickhoff, Junyi Jessy Li, Kyle Mahowald, Michal Golovanevsky, William Rudman
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 24

PRISM-VLM: A Multi-Axis Discriminative Benchmark for Compact Vision-Language Models

PRISM‑VLM is a new benchmark for compact vision‑language models that evaluates each item across seven axes—task quality, behavioral robustness, and capability bottlenecks—rather than collapsing performance into a single accuracy score. It aggregates these axes into a single PScore while also providing per‑axis profiles, revealing differences that single‑axis benchmarks miss, such as sycophancy. The benchmark draws on items from fifteen public datasets and will be released with its full pipeline, prompts, and annotations.

By Sanghee Park, Kee-Eung Kim