← Back to all news
arXiv AI By Mengnan Li, Jason Miller, Zaid Abulawi, Zachary Prince, Matt Kohl, Jack M. Cavaluzzi, Guillaume Giudicelli, Casey T. Icenhour, Alexander Lindsay, Cody Permann

MOOSEnger: A Simulation-Aware AI Agent Framework for the MOOSE Ecosystem

Read the original on arXiv AI →

MOOSEnger is a simulation‑aware AI agent framework designed for the MOOSE ecosystem, integrating an interchangeable reasoning model with domain knowledge, revised simulation artifacts, MOOSE‑specific validation, and executable solver feedback. Its generate‑check‑repair‑run workflow uses MOOSE knowledge retrieval, HIT‑aware parsing, syntax metadata, diagnostics, and revision‑controlled authoring to bind evidence to each input revision and guide bounded repair before acceptance. Across 200 prompts, MOOSEnger raises executable success from 5% to 89.5% with GPT‑5.2 and from 0% to 76.5% with Gemma 4 31B, and a ten‑case benchmark shows all generated inputs meet semantic alignment, with eight also meeting numerical‑accuracy criteria.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Related stories

arXiv AI
Aug 26

Beyond Executable Models: The Pufibara Agent Harness and the Modelica Agent Workflow Benchmark for Physical System Modeling

The paper introduces Pufibara, an agent harness designed to maintain engineering state and evidence across revisions in Modelica-based physical system modeling. It also presents a 232-task Modelica Agent Workflow Benchmark covering model repair, generation, and tuning, evaluated by an external benchmark-owned evaluator. Experiments show Pufibara outperforms Claude Code in task success and resource efficiency across two LLM backends.

By Zizhe Wang
llmsagentsbenchmarks
More like this →
arXiv AI
Sep 18

AURORA: A Natural Language-Driven Agentic Framework for Understanding, Reasoning, and Orchestrating Reliable Air-Ground Co-Simulation

AURORA is a natural‑language‑driven framework that treats air‑ground scenario generation as a compilation process with verification. It introduces the Air‑Ground Scenario Graph (AGSG), a typed intermediate representation linking agents, missions, events, communication, and success conditions, enabling joint grounding, temporal planning, pre‑execution checks, runtime verification, failure localization, and bounded repair. The authors also present AURORA‑Bench to evaluate not only execution but faithful realization of requested interactions, showing that structured execution and runtime verification improve reliability and that explicit intermediate representations facilitate verifiable and repairable co‑simulation.

By Keshu Wu, Hao Zhang, Rui Gan, Xiangbo Gao, Xiaopeng Li, Zhengzhong Tu, Yang Zhou
llmsagents
More like this →