arXiv AI By Kailai Feng, Haoxiang Rao, Yuxiang Wei, Bo Chen, Junsong Li, Yang Pan, Chengkun Cai, Jagmohan Chauhan

MoI-Bench: A Benchmark for Image Generation and Editing on Mobile Devices

Read the original on arXiv AI →

MoI-Bench is a new benchmark designed for on‑device image generation and editing, featuring 64 subtasks and 1150 samples that cover 16 operations and eight visual target categories. It introduces MoI‑Eval, a task‑specific evaluation framework that assesses instruction following, visual quality, and detail preservation, and aggregates results into a two‑dimensional Quality‑Deployability map. The benchmark reveals that current on‑device models excel at efficient generation or editing but need improved editing quality and broader task coverage, especially for text replacement and identity preservation.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 3

MIEScore: Human-Aligned Evaluation for Multi-Source Image Editing

Recent advances in unified multimodal models have significantly improved text-guided image editing abilities. In particular, models such as Nano-Banana-Pro and GPT-Image-2 demonstrate emerging capabilities in multi-source image editing (MIE), including tasks such as object synthesis, person-background composition, and cross-image style fusion.

arXiv Computer Vision
5d ago

From Evaluation to Evolution: Benchmarking Image Editing and Evolving Image Models

The paper introduces WeGenEditBench, a benchmark with 2,740 evaluation instances and 148 task types for image editing, focusing on local failure detection and prioritization for model improvement. It also presents WeGenEvoStudio, a multi‑agent harness that supports recursive self‑improvement by diagnosing failures, constructing retrieval‑grounded data, and adapting models. Experiments show that models such as GPT‑Image‑2 and Seedream‑5.0‑Pro excel in single‑image and text‑intensive editing, and evolution experiments demonstrate significant targeted gains on selected benchmarks.

By Jun He, Canmiao Fu, Ying Zhang, Zhipeng Huang, Chenyu Mu, Yazhen Xie, Chen Li, Jing Lyu, Weijia Li, Xiang Zhang
arXiv AI
Jun 2

TECCI: Tricky Edits of Collected and Curated Images

arXiv:2606. 01213v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Despite tremendous recent progress, current text-guided image editing methods still struggle with many aspects of editing involving instruction following, minimally editing the source image, and ensuring high visual quality.

By Aishwarya Agrawal, Roy Hirsch, Yasumasa Onoe, Sherry Ben, Jason Baldridge
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 27

PlanViz: Evaluating Planning-Oriented Image Generation and Editing for Computer-Use Tasks

arXiv:2602.06663v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Unified multimodal models (UMMs) have shown impressive capabilities in complex natural image generation. However, their potential in computer-use p...

By Junxian Li, Kai Liu, Leyang Chen, Weida Wang, Zhixin Wang, Jiaqi Xu, Fan Li, Renjing Pei, Linghe Kong, Yulun Zhang
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 27

VGA-BenchV2: An Expanded Unified Benchmark and Multi-Model Framework for Evaluating Video Aesthetics and Generation Quality

VGA‑BenchV2 is an expanded, human‑aligned benchmark and optimization framework that jointly evaluates video generation quality and aesthetic value. It builds on the original VGA‑Bench taxonomy, adding 52 sub‑dimensions and 1,016 curated prompts to generate over 60,000 videos from 12 mainstream models. The benchmark significantly enlarges human supervision with 36,000 task‑level annotations and introduces a hybrid evaluator (VAQA‑Net, VTag‑Net, VGQA‑Net) that aligns well with human judgments and can be used as a reward model for reinforcement‑learning fine‑tuning.

By Longteng Jiang, DanDan Zheng, Qianqian Qiao, Heng Huang, Huaye Wang, Yihang Bo, Bao Peng, Jingdong Chen, Jun Zhou, Xin Jin