arXiv AI By Jiada Li

Mirror-Score: Calibrated, Inference-only Scoring Exposes the Limits of Sequence-compatibility Ranking in D-peptide Design

Read the original on arXiv AI →

Mirror-Score is a calibrated, inference‑only scoring framework that evaluates heterochiral D‑peptide/L‑protein complexes, addressing the inadequacies of raw ProteinMPNN negative log‑likelihood (NLL) ranking. The authors benchmarked 31 crystal complexes across four target families, showing that NLL has poor affinity correlation (Spearman 0.19) while Boltz‑2 mirror‑space co‑folding confidence and pLDDT metrics can correctly rank peptides within a viral‑entry family. The study also proposes a prospective design protocol for antimicrobial‑resistance targets and releases all code, data, and structures publicly.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 25

TopU-LBVS: A Realistic Multi Target Benchmark for Ligand Based Virtual Screening

TopU-LBVS is a new multi‑target benchmark for ligand‑based virtual screening that addresses shortcomings of existing datasets by using hard‑negative decoys and a fixed 1:40 active‑to‑decoy ratio. It covers 93 protein targets across seven classes, provides three evaluation protocols (full, low‑data, and mini), and includes curated ChEMBL‑35 bioactivity data with property‑matched, structurally similar decoys. The benchmark demonstrates that performance drops sharply when moving from random‑decoy to hard‑negative evaluation, and it releases data, splits, code, and baseline implementations for reproducible comparison.

By Surbhi Kumar, Yuhe Zhou, Varun Shiralkar, Niu Huang, Baris Coskunuzer
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 24

TopU-LBVS: A Realistic Multi Target Benchmark for Ligand Based Virtual Screening

TopU-LBVS is a new multi‑target benchmark for ligand‑based virtual screening that addresses shortcomings of previous datasets by using hard‑negative decoys and a fixed 1:40 active‑to‑decoy ratio. It covers 93 protein targets across seven classes, provides three evaluation protocols (full, low‑data, and mini), and includes curated ChEMBL‑35 bioactivity data with property‑matched, structurally similar decoys to reduce shortcut learning. The benchmark comes with released data, fixed splits, evaluation code, and baseline implementations for reproducible comparison of LBVS and molecular representation methods.

arXiv AI
Sep 25

CaliPPer: quantifying, predicting and improving AI model performance for binding prediction

CaliPPer is a post‑hoc framework that calibrates and predicts the performance of binding‑prediction models by combining a multi‑chain Sample‑to‑Domain Distance (S2DD) metric with distance‑aware Bayesian recalibration. It operates at three resolutions—generalisability score, aggregate performance prediction, and per‑sample confidence—achieving strong distance‑performance correlations (|r| = 0.80–0.92) and low prediction errors for AUROC, AP, and F1. In retrospective analyses of five published studies, CaliPPer increased true discovery rates, improving AUROC by up to +0.20 on unseen epitopes and variants and raising confirmed neoantigen findings from 0/5 to 3/5.

By Jian-Qing Zheng, Hantao Lou, Zinan Yin, Sam Farrar, Yuze Zhou, Elie Antoun, Xiangxi Wang, Xuetao Cao, Tao Dong
arXiv AI
Oct 21

HierDTA: Hierarchical Structure-Aware Representation Learning for Drug--Target Affinity Prediction

HierDTA is a hierarchical structure‑aware framework for drug–target affinity prediction that represents drugs as atom–motif heterogeneous graphs and proteins as residue interaction graphs. It integrates atom and residue representations via cross‑attention, supplemented by molecule fingerprints and pretrained ESM‑2 embeddings, achieving superior performance on the Davis and KIBA datasets and strong generalization in cold‑start scenarios. Ablation studies and interpretability analyses confirm the contributions of its hierarchical augmentation and interaction components, and case studies demonstrate early enrichment of candidate bioactive compounds.

By Huangchao Xu, Baohua Zhang, Qian Liu, Zhong Jin, Yi Du
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 5

Beyond Random Splits: Evaluating Drug-Target Affinity Models Under Chemically and Biologically Motivated Distribution Shifts Copy

The study investigates how different distribution shifts affect the evaluation of drug‑target affinity (DTA) models, using 718,800 drug‑protein pairs from ChEMBL and BindingDB. It compares a baseline Morgan‑fingerprint + protein‑CNN model with 12 architectures that combine four drug representations and three ESM‑2 interaction modes, finding that mean validation RMSE rises significantly under protein‑cluster and dual out‑of‑distribution (OOD) scenarios. Model rankings remain consistent across chemical shifts but diverge under protein and dual OOD, indicating that architecture selection depends on the specific extrapolation context rather than just average error or training‑set size. Why it matters: The results suggest that DTA benchmarks should be designed to reflect the chemical and target shifts expected in real deployment, ensuring that chosen models perform reliably when applied to new chemical series or protein targets.

By Minjae Chung, Clara Li, Malar Paavai Muthukumaran, Shaunna Wang, Aniket Ramkrishnan Iyer, Shaun Qien Yeau Tan, Harinishree Sathu, Micky C. Nnamdi, J. Ben Tamo, Benoit Louis Marteau, May Dongmei Wang