The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
The study introduces a two‑dimensional framework to audit French news headlines, distinguishing salience framing—captured by four wording devices—from selection framing—captured by outlet‑level story form and high‑charge distributions. Using a 10,000‑headline supervision set annotated by LLMs and human arbitration, the authors classify 902,111 headlines from 25 outlets (2022‑2025) and find that salience and selection diverge yet correlate, that default thresholds inflate salience estimates, and that headlines mentioning Jews, the Far‑right, and Muslims exhibit the highest salience rates. The authors release their dataset, lexicons, and code, claiming it is the largest French headline framing audit to date.
arXiv:2610.28092v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Persuasive writing exploits cognitive biases, recruiting a reader's mental shortcuts to shape belief, often without the reader noticing. We call the...
arXiv:2405. 17838v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Socio-linguistic indicators of affectively-relevant phenomena, such as emotion or sentiment, are often extracted from text to better understand features of human-computer interactions, including on social media.
The paper presents a quantitative method for analyzing historical change in Italian media by reconstructing a diachronic corpus of about 600,000 articles from "La Repubblica" (1985‑2000). Using NLP to examine lexical and semantic patterns, and tools from complex systems, the authors identify shifts in media discourse, such as Italy’s transition from the First to the Second Republic and major international conflicts like the Gulf and Kosovo Wars. They find that war periods correspond to lower semantic entropy, indicating a more focused discourse.
arXiv:2608.21385v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Social media has become a central arena in which armed conflicts are contested, yet the pro-Israel and pro-Palestine communities on Telegram, whose b...
The paper presents a system for the Touché 2026 causality extraction challenge, focusing on counter‑causal claims—sentences that appear causal but actually deny causation. It tackles three subtasks: detecting causal sentences, extracting cause and effect spans, and labeling polarity (procausal, counter‑causal, or uncausal). The approach uses a fine‑tuned classifier with a cross‑task rule for detection, an ensemble of three RoBERTa‑large BILOU+CRF taggers for extraction, and counter‑causal data augmentation via a large language model for polarity classification, achieving state‑of‑the‑art scores on the CCNC test set.