arXiv:2606. 08491v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Relational deep learning (RDL) converts relational databases (RDBs) into heterogeneous graphs, but graphs derived directly from database schemas are often not well suited for how graph neural networks (GNNs) perform relational reasoning.
By Yao Cheng, Siqiang Luo
MetaRTL is a two-stage framework for relational table learning that first generates lightweight pre-trained table embeddings and then applies non‑parametric message passing to extract meta‑path features. These features are aggregated using an attention module called MetaAttn, shifting computation from deep GNN stacks to efficient meta‑path aggregation. Experiments on 10 real‑world datasets across 24 tasks show that MetaRTL achieves strong performance while reducing computational cost.
By Ken Zhong, Weichen Li, Zheng Wang
arXiv:2607. 03659v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Relational databases (RDBs) are the primary data infrastructure in many enterprises, yet recent deep learning methods designed for RDBs have been evaluated under inconsistent experimental protocols, making fair comparison difficult.
By Kazi F. Akhter, Bharath Ajendla, Manar D. Samad
arXiv:2610.20534v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Relational deep learning has emerged as a powerful paradigm for learning end-to-end predictive models over relational databases by representing them as...
By Viet The Nguyen, Vijay Prakash Dwivedi, Gunther Gust
arXiv:2606. 03040v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Relational databases underpin modern enterprise, scientific, and healthcare systems, yet predictive machine learning on such data remains challenging due to their multi-table, heterogeneous, and temporal structure.
By Phillip Jiang
The paper introduces EDiS, an Edge‑Disjoint Subgraph sparsification framework that separates a one‑time structural extraction of a graph into cacheable edge‑disjoint subgraphs from the per‑epoch graph composition. By recombining these cached subgraphs under edge‑budget constraints, EDiS avoids repeated sampling or recomputation while allowing varying training graphs across epochs. Experiments on 19 node‑classification benchmarks show that EDiS outperforms 17 baselines in accuracy/ROC‑AUC, achieving the lowest average rank and gap‑to‑best, especially at tight edge budgets.
By Sai Karthik Navuluru, Siddhartha Shankar Das, Franck Dernoncourt, S M Ferdous, Ryan A. Rossi, Nesreen K. Ahmed, Baris Coskunuzer, Alex Pothen, Lakshman Tamil, Mahantesh M Halappanavar