arXiv Computation and Language By Sugam Panthi, Muhaiminul Yeamin, Siyan Luo, Rabab Abdelfattah

Memory Consolidation Flattens the Temporal Shape of User Facts

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper introduces the concept of aspectual flattening, where long‑term memory systems convert conversational statements into concise notes that omit temporal cues. Using the LAPSE benchmark, the authors show that several memory writer models consistently flatten progressive statements while preserving simple‑present ones, and this asymmetry persists across multiple configurations. Experiments reveal that the loss of temporal information can alter how downstream readers assess the validity of a fact and influence their decision‑making, sometimes leading them to act without further verification.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv AI
4d ago

Memory Is a Derivation: The Distributed-Evidence Paradox in Long-Term Agents

The paper introduces the Distributed‑Evidence Paradox, where long‑running LLM agents compress past interactions into persistent memories that may not be fully supported by the interaction history. It defines three key requirements—evidence scope, compositional validity, and admission reliability—and proposes DerivAudit, a framework that checks whether a memory is truly supported by the available history. Experiments on two memory corpora show that expanding the evidence base can recover support for many memories, yet many remain unsupported, and broader evidence alone does not guarantee reliable admission.

By Hongjun Liu, Chen Zhao