arXiv AI By Oleg Grynets, Dmytro Kostetskyi, Vasyl Lyashkevych

Measuring What a Specification Determines: A Formal Semantic-Block Model and an Execution-Judged Benchmark

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2608. 19475v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This work introduces a formal semantic-block model for specifications and an execution-judged benchmark for evaluating specification quality independently of model capability.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 20

Specification-delta-driven data governance: an empirical study of the «spec-delta» as the unit of change in lakehouse data platforms

Spec Driven Development SDD has consolidated the idea that the specification rather than the code should be the primary artefact governing AI assisted work. Tools such as GitHub Spec Kit, and proposals such as Constitutional SDD, have formalised this principle in the software domain, while the executable data-contracts literature has extended it to schema and quality enforcement at run time.

arXiv AI
Sep 12

SemVerBench: Benchmarking LLM Comprehension of Version-Constraint Resolution Semantics

SemVerBench is a benchmark that evaluates how well large language models (LLMs) understand and apply version-constraint resolution semantics, such as determining whether a version satisfies constraints like ^1.2.3 or >=2.0. The study finds that many models struggle with certain corner cases, with GPT‑5.1 performing poorly while Claude and Opus perform much better. The authors suggest that the failures stem from an activation/application gap rather than a lack of knowledge, and recommend that coding agents delegate version resolution to a dedicated resolver tool.

By Qibai Chen, Zeming Liu
arXiv AI
Aug 26

ESQ-Bench: A Multi-Tier Enterprise Oracle Benchmark for Evaluating NL2SQL Dialect Generalization and Silent Semantic Divergence

ESQ‑Bench is an Oracle‑first NL2SQL benchmark that introduces systematic complexity tiers and silent‑divergence evaluation across three enterprise schema levels. It provides six populated schemas (465 tables, 164,682 rows) on Oracle, PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQL Server, along with 550 gold‑validated question‑query pairs and a four‑metric evaluation harness. The benchmark reveals that state‑of‑the‑art models such as GPT‑4o and Claude Sonnet 4.6 experience significant drops in execution accuracy and high silent‑divergence rates as schema complexity increases, highlighting a gap between closed‑API models and open‑weight baselines on enterprise Oracle schemas.

By Sanjay Mishra, Divya Chukkapalli, Ganesh R. Naik