arXiv AI
Measuring Iterative Temporal Reasoning with Time Puzzles
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jun 12
Representing Time Series as Structured Programs for LLM Reasoning
arXiv:2606. 12481v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong reasoning and instruction-following capabilities, making them potentially powerful tools for time-series analysis.
arXiv AI
Jul 14
PRISM Edit: One Vector for All Temporal Answers
arXiv:2607. 11327v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Model editing keeps large language models (LLMs) up to date without retraining, but temporal facts expose a limitation of the prevailing locate-and-edit paradigm: an update is not always a replacement.
arXiv AI
Jul 29
Distilling Temporal Search and Reasoning: Evolving LLMs for Future Prediction via Harness-Assisted Efficient Data Synthesis
arXiv:2607. 25554v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Future event prediction carries broad social impact yet remains challenging.
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 22
SCoP: Structured Constraint Parsing for Evidence-Space Control in Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering
arXiv:2609.22213v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering (TKGQA) requires answer inference from evidence that is both structurally valid and temporally admissible....
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 20
SABET-QA: Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering
Question Answering over Temporal Knowledge Graphs (TKGQA) requires reasoning over time-sensitive facts, yet existing embedding-based methods struggle with multi-step queries due to single-pass reasoning pipelines. We propose SABET-QA, a framework that iteratively refines reasoning states across multiple hops via a bidirectional entity-temporal scoring mechanism and a slot-aware contextualization module that aligns question semantics with temporal KG embeddings.
arXiv AI
Aug 18
A Temporal Reasoning Benchmarking Framework for LRMs via Difficulty-controlled and Dynamic Test Generation
arXiv:2607. 04784v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Defining the reasoning boundaries and ensuring the reliability of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) remains a critical challenge.