arXiv AI By Luan Ozelim, Hector Zenil

Measuring in-context algorithmic reasoning in language models against an exact Bayes-optimal reference

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces F-ICL, a benchmark that measures in‑context algorithmic reasoning in language models by exhaustively enumerating 86 million valid programs of length ≤13 on a Turing‑complete machine and computing the exact posterior under a bounded Levin–Solomonoff prior. Unlike typical benchmarks, F‑ICL provides a distributional reference rather than just answers, allowing the evaluation of models’ inductive priors. Across 105 configurations of models ranging from 0.8 B to 675 B parameters, models achieve up to 92 % accuracy, yet many still deviate from the Bayes‑optimal reference, and the study derives theoretical bounds on cumulative loss for predictors with positive prior weight on the reference.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 3

Large Language Bayes Is Not Reparameterisation-Invariant

Large Language Bayes (LLB) samples probabilistic programs from a language model, runs approximate inference on each, and averages them weighted by an exponentiated evidence bound. The authors demonstrate that this weighting is not invariant to reparameterisation, unlike the log marginal likelihood, leading to significant discrepancies in weights across different program formulations. These discrepancies can reach up to 31.9×, affect Bayes factors, and introduce controlled errors in posterior estimates.

By Jian Xu