The paper presents an iterative framework that uses large language models (LLMs) to automatically extract interpretable, schema‑bound categorical features from unstructured text for use in tabular prediction models. A generator LLM proposes semantic definitions, an extractor LLM materializes the features, and a downstream tabular model evaluates their predictive performance, with error‑driven natural‑language feedback guiding the search. Across three public datasets, the error‑driven loop speeds up feature discovery up to three times and the resulting features outperform any subset when combined with TF‑IDF and dense embeddings, while also providing instance‑level interpretability through SHAP importance rankings and a semantic audit trail.
By Merwan Barlier, Blaz Skrlj
arXiv:2608. 05207v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Frozen pretrained forecasters often fail in structured, recurring ways that are costly to repair through fine-tuning.
By Fangxin Wang, Ziyi Zhang, Diyi Zhuang, Langzhou He, Shiyu Wang, Baichuan Mo, Philip S. Yu
SymboLLM-FE combines symbolic regression and large language models to automate feature engineering for tabular data. It first extracts mathematically expressive formulas that correlate strongly with the target, then refines them with LLMs to improve interpretability. Experiments on six real‑world datasets and four Kaggle competitions show that SymboLLM‑FE outperforms existing AutoFE methods while reducing the number of costly LLM calls.
By Zi-Jian Cheng, Zi-Yi Jia, Zhi Zhou, Yu-Feng Li, Lan-Zhe Guo
arXiv:2607. 23286v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automatic feature engineering (AutoFE) for tabular learning can be naturally formulated as a program synthesis problem, where the objective is to discover predictive feature transformations from an exponentially large search space.
By Sha Li, Naren Ramakrishnan
arXiv:2512. 13374v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) open new perspectives for automation in optimization, yet little is known about whether their internal representations capture problem structure or algorithmic behavior.
By Francesca Da Ros, Luca Di Gaspero, Kevin Roitero
arXiv:2607. 27389v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learning-to-optimize (L2O) methods accelerate repeated optimization by training models to predict solutions, warm starts, branching decisions, or other forms of solver guidance.
By Bingheng Li, Junyang Cai, Yupeng Zhang, Bistra Dilkina, Jayant Kalagnanam, Dzung T. Phan