arXiv AI
Limitations on Autoregressive Token Generation via Sequential Sampling
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Sep 30
Controlled Decoding Attacks on Black-Box LLMs
arXiv:2609.36956v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Manipulating next-token probabilities during generation can bypass the safety alignment of large language models. Existing approaches, however, rely...
arXiv AI
Jun 9
Steganography Without Modification: Hidden Communication via LLM Seeds
arXiv:2606. 09135v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We demonstrate that widely deployed Large Language Model (LLM) inference stacks harbor a steganographic channel that requires no modification to model weights, sampling code, or output distributions.
arXiv AI
Aug 25
Adversarial Entropy Inflation Against Gumbel-Based Inference Verification
arXiv:2608.23375v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Gumbel-based inference verification bounds LLM weight exfiltration by only forgiving token choices that plausibly arise from honest GPU nondeterminis...
arXiv AI
Jul 24
Refusal-Gated Decoding: Preserving Refusal Behavior Under High-Temperature Sampling
arXiv:2607. 20791v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: High-temperature sampling is one of the primary mechanisms for increasing diversity in LLMs.
arXiv AI
Jun 4
Inference-Time Vulnerability Beyond Shallow Safety: Alignment Along Generation Trajectories
arXiv:2606. 04778v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safety-aligned Large Language Models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to interventions during inference that redirect generation toward harmful outputs.
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 12
ProbGuard: Calibrated Safety Risk Estimation from LLM Output Distributions
arXiv:2608. 10621v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent research on Large Language Model (LLM) safety has widely adopted guardrails to identify unsafe LLM outputs.