arXiv AI
LifeSearch: Benchmarking Deep Research Agents for Real-World Life and Productivity
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 11
DeepResearch Bench II: Diagnosing Deep Research Agents via Rubrics from Expert Reports
Deep Research Bench II is a new benchmark designed to evaluate Deep Research Agents (DRAs) by requiring them to produce research reports for 132 grounded tasks across 22 domains. Each report is assessed using 9,430 fine‑grained binary rubrics that cover information recall, analysis, and presentation, all derived from expert‑written investigative articles through a rigorous LLM‑plus‑human pipeline. Evaluation of current state‑of‑the‑art DRAs shows that even the best models satisfy fewer than 50% of these rubrics, highlighting a significant gap between automated agents and human experts.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 31
EMBL AI Librarian: Life-Sciences Knowledge Layer for AI Agents
arXiv:2607. 28229v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The web is increasingly accessed by AI agents rather than humans.
arXiv AI
Jun 8
Act As a Real Researcher: A Suite of Benchmarks Evaluating Frontier LLMs and Agentic Harnesses in Research Lifecycle
arXiv:2606. 07462v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As foundation models advance and agent scaffolding becomes increasingly sophisticated, agents have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in complex, long-horizon coding tasks and even autonomous experiment execution.
arXiv AI
Jun 12
DailyReport: An Open-ended Benchmark for Evaluating Search Agents on Daily Search Tasks
arXiv:2606. 12871v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Search Agents (SAs) typically leverage large language models (LLMs) to support complex information-seeking tasks by autonomously exploring web sources and synthesizing information into comprehensive responses.
arXiv AI
Jul 29
Messier: A High-Resolution Corpus for Cross-Benchmark Agent Evaluation
arXiv:2607. 25891v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating AI agents in interactive environments is hindered by fragmented tasks, scaffolds, verifiers, and scoring rules.
arXiv AI
Oct 9
\$OneMillion-Bench: How Far are Language Agents from Human Experts?
The paper introduces OneMillion-Bench (OMB), a benchmark comprising 400 expert-curated tasks across Law, Finance, Industry, Healthcare, and Natural Science. OMB evaluates language agents on complex, real-world scenarios that require authoritative source retrieval, conflict resolution, domain-specific rule application, and constraint decision-making. The benchmark uses a rubric-based scoring system assessing factual accuracy, logical coherence, practical feasibility, and professional compliance to differentiate agent performance on expert-level problems.