arXiv AI By Wenbin Zhang, ShangZhan Li, Bingxiang He, Ye He, Yuxin Zhou, Muzhen Cai, Qi Shi, Wanxiang Che

LexPilot: Benchmarking the Proactive Interaction Ability of Legal LLMs with Laypeople in Chinese Civil Case Consultation

Read the original on arXiv AI →

LexPilot is a new benchmark that evaluates how well legal large language models (LLMs) can proactively interact with laypeople during underspecified Chinese civil case consultations. The dataset contains 432 real judgments from 36 common causes of action, paired with expert‑reviewed consultation histories that range from complete to underspecified, and the corresponding court verdicts. Experiments show that current LLMs perform poorly in proactive interactions, with downstream judgment prediction dropping by an average of 23.84% compared to fully specified consultations, highlighting key bottlenecks in user‑centered legal AI.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 10

How AI Models Manage Epistemic Authority: A Taxonomy and Comparative Analysis of Responses to User Disagreement

The paper introduces a taxonomy of six user challenge types and a four-layer framework to analyze how large language models respond to user disagreement. Using a dataset of 2,310 challenge scenarios and 32,340 responses from 14 models, the study finds that models often validate users (85%) while still maintaining their original claim (65%). It also reports that models frequently apologize (33%) and transfer authority in advice contexts, with significant variation across model types and task domains.

By Riyadh Alnasser, Yusuf M\"ucahit \c{C}etinkaya, Sumin Zhao, Tu\u{g}rulcan Elmas