arXiv:2607. 28628v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Dualities play an important role in establishing both microscopic and emergent phenomena in a wide range of physical systems.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.
Dualities play an important role in establishing both microscopic and emergent phenomena in a wide range of physical systems. In practice, though, it can often be computationally challenging to establish when two systems are dual, even when all of the "rules of the game" are well-known.
arXiv:2608. 19331v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We modify the NN/QFT duality [1] to incorporate the layerwise permutation symmetry of the network, resulting in a $(0\!
arXiv:2607. 07127v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Lattice field theory is the workhorse of non-perturbative physics, used to simulate phenomena from the strong nuclear force to critical phenomena in materials.
arXiv:2608. 13335v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neural networks trained by gradient descent on a smooth cost function can nevertheless learn in steps: the cost holds on long plateaus and then drops abruptly.
The paper investigates the limits of implementing neural network field theory on a computer, focusing on function classes that are regular enough for computation. It presents a no‑go theorem showing that finite‑width network ensembles cannot consistently realize either a quantum or effective field theory due to violations of reflection positivity and lack of scale separation. The study distinguishes between finite‑width and infinite‑width interpretations, concluding that only smeared correlators of the infinite‑width limit are computable with controlled error, and identifies two possible ways to evade the theorem—by relaxing finite variance or exact rotation invariance.
arXiv:2605. 20440v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Symmetry is central to the physical sciences, yet machine learning usually captures it only approximately, leaving a residual per-step equivariance error $\varepsilon$ that compounds with depth $M$ as $M\varepsilon$, whereas exact equivariance holds at unbounded depth; we demonstrate this divergence at fourteen orders of magnitude.