arXiv:2606. 15160v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reasoning capabilities of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have improved considerably in recent years.
By David Huang, Lianlei Shan
AgenticRag‑R1 is a reinforcement‑learning framework that integrates reasoning, retrieval, and memory through a stack and fine‑grained action space. It uses hierarchical action‑aware rewards and an information‑aware trajectory rejection strategy to support long‑horizon learning. Experiments on multi‑hop, open‑domain, and agentic reasoning benchmarks show that AgenticRag‑R1 outperforms strong baselines and produces robust, interpretable, memory‑aware reasoning behaviors.
By Xinke Jiang, Yue Fang, Zhibang Yang, Jiaran Gao, Zhixin Zhang, Tao Feng, Rihong Qiu, Wentao Zhang, Hongxin Ding, Ruizhe Zhang, Yongxin Xu, Yuheng Huang, Xu Chu, Junfeng Zhao, Yasha Wang
LatentHarness unifies memory access and latent reasoning by treating them as sequential latent actions—THINK, RECALL, and EXIT—within a language model. It is trained via counterfactual policy distillation, which evaluates the impact of each action on the emitted token and learns when to recall evidence versus continue reasoning. On six long‑context reasoning benchmarks, a 1.4B‑parameter LatentHarness model outperforms the strongest baselines by 2.8% and 10.0% relative, while running 5.9× faster than the leading long‑context baseline.
By Xiaoqiang Wang, Suyuchen Wang, Bang Liu
arXiv:2606. 29164v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Latent reasoning models perform multi-step inference directly in hidden-state space, yet the structure of these latent reasoning trajectories remains poorly understood.
By Arun Vignesh Malarkkan, Manan Roy Choudhury, Utkarsh Byahut, Yash Ravindra Charde, Vivek Gupta, Yanjie Fu
arXiv:2606. 16360v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting improves reasoning in large language models (LLMs) by externalizing intermediate computation as discrete text tokens, but this textual interface also introduces redundancy and inference overhead.
By Hanyu Lin, Min Cai, Jiawei Wen, Haodi Zhang
The paper introduces Latent Motion Reasoning (LMR), a two‑stage approach that separates text‑to‑motion generation into a planning phase and an execution phase. LMR uses a Dual‑Granularity Tokenizer to create a compressed, semantically rich reasoning latent for global trajectory planning and a high‑frequency execution latent for detailed motion fidelity. Experiments on T2M‑GPT and MotionStreamer show that this architecture improves both semantic alignment and physical plausibility compared to direct translation methods.
By Yijie Qian, Juncheng Wang, Yuxiang Feng, Chao Xu, Wang Lu, Yang Liu, Baigui Sun, Yiqiang Chen, Yong Liu, Shujun Wang