arXiv Machine Learning By Chuning Zhu, Eva Xu, Jose Barreiros, Krishnan Srinivasan, Paarth Shah, Abhishek Gupta

Latent Memory Palace: Reasoning for Control as Autoregressive Variational Inference

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2607. 08724v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Human decision-making is highly flexible -- some actions are taken immediately; others require longer deliberation.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Sep 1

AgenticRag-R1: Agentic Reinforcement Learning with Stack Memory for Multi-Step Reasoning, Retrieval and Memorizing

AgenticRag‑R1 is a reinforcement‑learning framework that integrates reasoning, retrieval, and memory through a stack and fine‑grained action space. It uses hierarchical action‑aware rewards and an information‑aware trajectory rejection strategy to support long‑horizon learning. Experiments on multi‑hop, open‑domain, and agentic reasoning benchmarks show that AgenticRag‑R1 outperforms strong baselines and produces robust, interpretable, memory‑aware reasoning behaviors.

By Xinke Jiang, Yue Fang, Zhibang Yang, Jiaran Gao, Zhixin Zhang, Tao Feng, Rihong Qiu, Wentao Zhang, Hongxin Ding, Ruizhe Zhang, Yongxin Xu, Yuheng Huang, Xu Chu, Junfeng Zhao, Yasha Wang
arXiv Computation and Language
3d ago

LatentHarness: Learning Latent Actions for Memory and Reasoning via Counterfactual Policy Distillation

LatentHarness unifies memory access and latent reasoning by treating them as sequential latent actions—THINK, RECALL, and EXIT—within a language model. It is trained via counterfactual policy distillation, which evaluates the impact of each action on the emitted token and learns when to recall evidence versus continue reasoning. On six long‑context reasoning benchmarks, a 1.4B‑parameter LatentHarness model outperforms the strongest baselines by 2.8% and 10.0% relative, while running 5.9× faster than the leading long‑context baseline.

By Xiaoqiang Wang, Suyuchen Wang, Bang Liu
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 17

Think Before You Move: Latent Motion Reasoning for Text-to-Motion Generation

The paper introduces Latent Motion Reasoning (LMR), a two‑stage approach that separates text‑to‑motion generation into a planning phase and an execution phase. LMR uses a Dual‑Granularity Tokenizer to create a compressed, semantically rich reasoning latent for global trajectory planning and a high‑frequency execution latent for detailed motion fidelity. Experiments on T2M‑GPT and MotionStreamer show that this architecture improves both semantic alignment and physical plausibility compared to direct translation methods.

By Yijie Qian, Juncheng Wang, Yuxiang Feng, Chao Xu, Wang Lu, Yang Liu, Baigui Sun, Yiqiang Chen, Yong Liu, Shujun Wang