Lasting Effects of Abstract Pretraining Beyond Perplexity
Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at Hugging Face Trending Papers.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at Hugging Face Trending Papers.
arXiv:2609.38764v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models are typically pretrained from random initialization. Recent work challenges this convention, showing that a brief warm-up on abstract,...
Large Language Models fail at implicit multi-hop reasoning: a model answers "When was $X$ born? " and "Who is $Y$'s closest friend?
arXiv:2410.17021v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models with chain-of-thought prompting, such as OpenAI-o1, have shown impressive capabilities in natural language inference tasks. H...
arXiv:2609.34187v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The strong version of the stochastic parrot argument claims that, although large language models (LLMs) may exceed rote regurgitation, they c...
Large Language Models struggle with implicit multi‑hop reasoning, correctly answering individual facts but failing to combine them in a single pass. In a controlled setting, the authors show that this failure persists even with high 1‑hop accuracy, indicating it is due to pretraining exposure rather than missing knowledge. They test nine data‑centric augmentation formats and find that only individuals seen in compositional contexts during pretraining enable transfer to unseen questions, proving exposure to such contexts is necessary for implicit multi‑hop reasoning.
arXiv:2606. 17945v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models provide a tractable system for asking how intelligence itself emerges, rather than only how LLMs can be engineered.