Hugging Face Trending Papers

Language Models Represent and Transform Concepts with Shared Geometry

Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →

How concepts are represented in neural networks is a fundamental question in machine learning. The dominant view treats concept representations as stationary geometric objects.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at Hugging Face Trending Papers.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 1

Symmetry in language statistics shapes the geometry of model representations

arXiv:2602. 15029v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The internal representations learned by language models consistently exhibit striking geometric structure: calendar months organize into a circle, historical years form a smooth one-dimensional manifold, and cities' latitudes and longitudes can be decoded using a linear probe.

By Dhruva Karkada, Daniel J. Korchinski, Andres Nava, Matthieu Wyart, Yasaman Bahri
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

The Changing Geometry of Grammar: Dimensionality and Neighborhood Reorganization across Transformer Layers

The paper studies how transformer representations evolve across layers by examining the intrinsic dimensionality (ID) of token embeddings and their neighborhood structures. It finds that closed‑class tokens expand and collapse earlier than open‑class tokens, and that these changes are linked to shifts in local geometry. The authors compare encoder and decoder models, showing distinct layer‑wise behaviors, and demonstrate that geometric features alone can predict a token’s part‑of‑speech and reveal how semantic content changes across layers.

By Samuele Vallisa, Federico Ravenda, Claudio Palominos, Rui He, Andrea Raballo, Antonietta Mira, Philipp Homan, Wolfram Hinzen
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

The information geometry of large language models is shared, learned, and controllable

The paper investigates how large language models (LLMs) share a common Fisher‑Rao geometry in their next‑token probability distributions, revealing that behaviour largely determines this geometry while activation geometry depends on coordinate choices. Across transformer, state‑space, and recurrent architectures, output geometries align more closely than activation geometries, and this shared structure facilitates semantic‑category transfer and improves agreement with human word choices as models scale and train. The study further demonstrates that geometry can guide minimum‑disturbance interventions, enabling reusable control that preserves behaviour better than Euclidean methods and enhances steering, editing, attribution, dictionary learning, and fine‑tuning.

By Dario Picozzi