arXiv:2606. 01086v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Flow and diffusion models generate high-quality samples in many modalities; however, many network evaluations are required during inference due to numerical integration of an underlying differential equation.
By Sam McCallum, Zander W. Blasingame, Timothy Herschell, Niklas Rindtorff, Alexander Tong, James Foster
arXiv:2607. 00535v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Few-step flow-map generators, such as consistency models and MeanFlow, accelerate sampling by directly learning long-range transport maps between noise and data.
By Zhiqi Li, Wen Zhang, Bo Zhu
arXiv:2608. 05600v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Flow-based generative models are typically sampled by solving a deterministic ordinary differential equation (ODE), whereas online reinforcement learning requires stochastic rollouts for policy exploration and optimization.
By Yingqing Guo, Hui Yuan, Zijian He, Mengdi Wang, Zheng Ding
Flow-based generative models are typically sampled by solving a deterministic ordinary differential equation (ODE), whereas online reinforcement learning requires stochastic rollouts for policy exploration and optimization. Existing GRPO methods for flow models therefore replace the inference-time ODE with a stochastic differential equation (SDE) during training.
arXiv:2607. 26398v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Diffusion and flow-based models benefit from simple regression losses, but inference incurs significant overhead because sampling requires integration.
By Mark Goldstein, Anshuk Uppal, Raghav Singhal, Aahlad Puli, Rajesh Ranganath
arXiv:2608. 10384v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper studies inverse sampling for L\'evy-driven generative models from the perspective of Markov generators.
By Tianfu Qi, Jun Wang, Jun Zhang