The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
arXiv:2503. 06211v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Text-pretrained language models (LMs) encode rich world knowledge, but adapting them to process and generate perceptual modalities such as audio and images while effectively leveraging that knowledge remains challenging.
arXiv:2609.00443v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Language models learn about grammatical number primarily from co-occurrence, and show frequency effects as a result---sometimes taken to indicate tha...
arXiv:2508.05880v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Understanding human emotions is central to user-facing AI applications, safety alignment, and the simulation of human behavior. As emotional...
arXiv:2607. 16214v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Image descriptions represented with language models (LMs) predict human brain responses to naturalistic images in high-level visual regions, but the factors driving this predictivity remain unclear.
Melange is a synthetic visual bias benchmark designed to evaluate social biases in multi‑modal large language models (MLLMs). It extends the language‑only BBQ dataset by generating controlled visual scenarios that clearly depict target attributes, and validates images through automated VQA screening and human inspection. Using Melange, 23 open‑source MLLMs were tested in text‑only, image‑only, and image‑with‑context settings, revealing that switching from text to vision reduces fairness by an average of 0.291 and that models often choose stereotypical responses when biased answers are made.
OmniHallu is a unified framework for detecting hallucinations in multimodal large language models across both comprehension and generation tasks involving image, video, and audio modalities. It introduces OmniHallu-Bench, a 10,000-sample benchmark with claim-level human annotations for six cross-modal tasks (I2T, V2T, A2T, T2I, T2V, T2A). The system uses a multi‑agent architecture that decomposes outputs into atomic claims, verifies them with modality‑specific experts, and aggregates evidence through structured reasoning, while a preference‑optimized verifier reduces expert calls by 66% with minimal performance loss.