arXiv Machine Learning By Soohyun Choi, Seonvin Cho, Songnam Hong

Is One Step Enough for Offline Policy Improvement?

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2609. 03842v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Behavior regularization in offline reinforcement learning limits the exploitation of critic errors, but strong anchoring can also restrict policy improvement.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4

Multi-step Proximal Policy Improvement in Offline Reinforcement Learning

The paper introduces Multi-step Proximal Policy Improvement (MPI), a method that refines offline reinforcement learning policies through sequential re-centered proximal steps. By viewing policies as a probability manifold, MPI interprets a wide range of offline actor objectives as a single proximal policy improvement step and extends this to multiple steps for controlled policy improvement beyond the behavior distribution. Experiments on D4RL benchmarks demonstrate that a few MPI refinements enhance strong offline baselines such as TD3+BC, ReBRAC, and IQL, while diagnostics clarify the benefits of re-centered refinement over fixed-objective scheduling and highlight critic error limitations.

By Soohyun Choi, Seonvin Cho, Songnam Hong
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 3

Multi-step Proximal Policy Improvement in Offline Reinforcement Learning

The paper introduces Multi-step Proximal Policy Improvement (MPI), a method that refines offline reinforcement learning policies through sequential re-centered proximal steps. By modeling policies as a probability manifold, MPI interprets a wide range of offline actor objectives as a single proximal policy improvement step and extends this to multiple steps for controlled policy improvement beyond the behavior distribution. Experiments on D4RL benchmarks demonstrate that a few MPI refinements enhance strong offline baselines such as TD3+BC, ReBRAC, and IQL across many tasks, while diagnostics clarify the benefits of re-centered refinement over fixed-objective scheduling and highlight critic error limitations.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 11

OGPO: Sample Efficient Full-Finetuning of Generative Control Policies

arXiv:2605. 03065v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Generative control policies (GCPs), such as diffusion- and flow-based control policies, have emerged as effective parameterizations for robot learning.

By Sarvesh Patil, Mitsuhiko Nakamoto, Manan Agarwal, Shashwat Saxena, Jesse Zhang, Giri Anantharaman, Cleah Winston, Chaoyi Pan, Douglas Chen, Nai-Chieh Huang, Zeynep Temel, Oliver Kroemer, Sergey Levine, Abhishek Gupta, Hongkai Dai, Paarth Shah, Max Simchowitz
arXiv AI
Jun 6

Retry Policy Gradients in Continuous Action Spaces

arXiv:2606. 05888v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retry-based objectives such as pass@K and max@K optimize the best return obtained from multiple sampled trajectories, and recent work has shown that they can promote exploration without explicit exploration bonuses.

By Soichiro Nishimori, Paavo Parmas