TRACE is a lightweight learned selector that ranks completed search trajectories by aggregating cross‑rollout evidence, preserving individual query and evidence occurrences while propagating information across shared content or document identity. Trained with answer‑level supervision over frozen text embeddings, TRACE selects an existing answer without additional search or autoregressive aggregation, and a single selector generalizes across rollout policies and agent backbones. Across six WebQA policies, six long‑horizon dataset‑backbone combinations, and multiple WebQA benchmarks, TRACE outperforms majority voting and generative aggregators, achieving higher accuracy and at least tenfold higher processing throughput.
By Qisheng Zhou, Zhen Xiong, Qiaoyu Tan
arXiv:2610.06650v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Wikidata is one of the largest open knowledge bases, yet answering a complex question over it still requires a SPARQL query that names the right en...
By Mohamed Chenene, Carlos Rosas-Hinostroza, Anastasia Stasenko, Shani Evenstein Sigalov, Pierre-Carl Langlais
Clarify-Then-Search is a benchmark that tests whether large language models can ask clarification questions to improve the usefulness of deep search results. It uses 518 real-world query pairs from Baidu, where each intent query is paired with an underspecified version. The evaluation involves a clarifier asking up to three questions, a user answerer providing only explicit information, and a rewriter generating a new query that is then searched; performance is measured by a weighted nugget-recall score.
By Deqiang Huang, Jingbo Zhou, Xinjiang Lu, Tong Xu, Hua Wu, Enhong Chen
arXiv:2609.20844v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Deepresearch (DR) agents interact with real-world web environments through multi-turn search and visit, causing their contexts to grow rapidly over tim...
By Zihan Wang, Hao Wang, Boyuan Jiang, Yiqun Zhang, Shi Feng, Xiaocui Yang, Yiwen Ye, Jianghang Lin, Xiaozhong Ji, Jinghao Lin, Kai Wu
KnowForge is a modular pipeline for open‑domain multimodal document question answering that separates retrieval, judging, and reading into distinct agents. It uses a hybrid‑retrieval knowledge‑point index, a Locator agent for searching, a Bridge Judge to enforce a second hop, a Deep Reader that handles text, images, and tables, and a synthesizer with format checking. On the M3DocVQA benchmark it achieves an F1 of 47.5, outperforming prior systems by 11 points, and shows strong gains on MultiHop‑RAG and MMLongBench‑Doc as well.
By Wenlin Lin, Fanzhe Wei
arXiv:2610.24899v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: While LLM agents are increasingly capable of gathering and synthesizing evidence from a single homogeneous source, such as structured tables...
By Soyoung Yoon, Peiran Xu, Han Wang, Ruofan Wu, Xiaodong Yu, Feng Yan, Mohit Bansal, Debiao Li, Seung-Won Hwang, Yuxiong He, Zhewei Yao