arXiv Computer Vision
Investigating Relational Reasoning in VLMs
Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
Related stories
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 9
Seek-and-View Reasoning for Multi-View Spatial Understanding
The paper introduces Vantage, a training‑free, model‑agnostic framework that pairs a vision‑language model with a 3D foundation model to perform Seek‑and‑View reasoning for multi‑view spatial understanding. Vantage first analyzes a question to plan a relevant viewpoint, then augments reasoning with geometry‑grounded visual evidence from that viewpoint. Experiments across six VLMs on five benchmarks show consistent improvements without fine‑tuning, demonstrating that revealing spatial evidence through view‑grounded reasoning reduces reliance on language‑based cross‑view alignment.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 2
VisReason: A Large-Scale Dataset for Visual Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
arXiv:2511. 17731v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has proven remarkably effective for eliciting complex reasoning in large language models (LLMs).
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1
Decompose, Look, and Reason: Reinforced Latent Reasoning for VLMs
arXiv:2604.07518v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Vision-Language Models often struggle with complex visual reasoning due to the visual information loss in textual CoT. Existing methods either add...
arXiv AI
Jun 12
Perceive, Interact, Reason: Building Tool-Augmented Visual Agents for Spatial Reasoning
arXiv:2606. 12830v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While recent vision-language models (VLMs) demonstrate strong multimodal understanding, they remain limited in spatial reasoning tasks that require active evidence acquisition and multi-step visual interaction.
arXiv AI
Jun 19
Vero: An Open RL Recipe for General Visual Reasoning
arXiv:2604. 04917v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: What does it take to build a visual reasoner that works across charts, science, spatial understanding, and open-ended tasks?
arXiv AI
Sep 17
EDCT-Bench: Uncovering Faithfulness Gaps in VLMs via Explanation-Driven Counterfactual Testing
EDCT-Bench is a benchmark that evaluates the faithfulness of Vision‑Language Models (VLMs) by using Explanation‑Driven Counterfactual Testing (EDCT). EDCT extracts visual concepts from a model’s natural language explanation, applies minimal verified edits to those concepts, and checks whether the model’s answer and explanation remain consistent with the edited image. The benchmark covers three domains—knowledge‑intensive VQA, safety‑critical driving, and 3D spatial reasoning—and reveals significant faithfulness gaps in current VLMs, while also showing that EDCT‑generated counterfactuals can improve training.