arXiv Machine Learning By Gunwoo Lee, Changmin Sung, Sang-Hwan Gwak, Ina Kim, Ji-Young Choi, Kyong-Ha Lee

Intrinsic Sequence-Likelihood Confidence in Retrieval-Dominated Extractive QA: Two Pre-Specified Negatives, and What They Do and Do Not Attribute

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper investigates whether confidence signals from fine‑tuned large language models can improve extractive question answering that relies heavily on retrieval. Experiments on four 7‑9B model families show that retrieval alone recovers 92–99.8% of the best possible accuracy, leaving little room for confidence‑based routing or adaptation to help. The sequence‑likelihood confidence metric, even after recalibration or temperature scaling, fails to provide a statistically significant benefit across different correctness criteria and answer lengths, and the study ultimately offers a set of pre‑specified negatives with explicit dependencies as its main contribution.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Sep 1

Look It Up: Analysing Internal Web Search Capabilities of Modern LLMs

The paper evaluates how modern large language models use internal web search to answer factual questions. Using 783 static queries and 288 dynamic queries, the authors find that enabling retrieval improves accuracy on static questions but hurts confidence calibration. On dynamic queries, models often retrieve but still achieve less than 70% accuracy, mainly due to poor query formulation and source selection, indicating that internal web search works better as a quick verification tool than a full information‑retrieval system.

By Sahil Kale