arXiv:2608.30720v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Representational similarity is foundational to analyses of deep networks, yet distances between point-valued representations are not intrinsically tied...
By Kieran Murphy
The paper introduces an influence score that measures how much each attention head contributes to classification decisions in Transformer models, specifically for prompt injection detection. The score blends directional effects on logits with structural impact within the residual stream, allowing analysis at head, layer, and network scales. When applied to a DeBERTa model, the framework uncovers different decision patterns for correct versus incorrect predictions, offering a balanced approach between detailed circuit analysis and global output methods.
By Lisa Bouger, Yannick Teglia, Philippe Loubet Moundi
arXiv:2609.39188v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Developmental psychology holds that certain priors are given to infants prior to experience rather than induced from data, and that the influence of su...
By Dong Gyun Kang, Megha Thukral, Kwangsoo Kim
arXiv:2606. 03885v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Feature attribution methods explain predictions by assigning importance scores to input features.
By Kieran A. Murphy, Shameen Shrestha
arXiv:2601. 17952v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Interpretability remains a key challenge for deploying language models (LM) in clinical settings such as progression diagnosis of Alzheimer disease, where early and trustworthy predictions are essential.
By Michail Mamalakis, Tiago Azevedo, Cristian Cosentino, Chiara D'Ercoli, Subati Abulikemu, Zhongtian Sun, Richard Bethlehem, Pietro Lio
The paper proposes that two architectural assumptions—(1) attention and MLPs share a key‑value form <phi(S)>U, and (2) components read from an additive residual stream—are sufficient to answer three interpretability questions: component interaction, information routing, and token attribution. By treating these selections as a computational graph, the authors develop Unpack, a backward attribution method that validates interaction scores, recovered routes, and token attribution against established tests across models ranging from 160M to 6.9B parameters. The study also shows that contribution and causal effect can differ, with a recognizable signature in how components change when a task is removed.
By Po-Kai Chen, Aske Plaat, Niki van Stein