arXiv:2506. 21887v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: High-stakes decision-making involves navigating multiple competing objectives with expensive evaluations.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2608.28620v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Preference elicitation is essential for aligning AI systems with human values. Prior approaches (e.g., for organ allocation) often ask stakeholders to...
arXiv:2605. 04267v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Interactive multi-objective optimization systems face a budget allocation dilemma: one can spend resources on expensive objective evaluations or on eliciting decision-maker preferences that identify the relevant region of the Pareto set.
arXiv:2606. 23603v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Unhealthy dietary behavior continues to be a persistent public health issue in the United States, exacerbated by recommendation systems that prioritize user preference without considering nutritional health.
arXiv:2512.08029v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Clinical decision-making in oncology requires forecasting how disease evolves under treatment, yet most AI systems remain static predictors that ca...
arXiv:2606. 04468v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Offline multi-objective optimization (Offline MOO) aims to discover novel Pareto-optimal designs based on static datasets without expensive environment interactions.
arXiv:2606. 19521v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In multi-task learning, handling an increasing number of objectives can quickly become challenging, both in terms of the computational resources and the decision maker's capacity to choose appropriate trade-offs.