arXiv AI By Jiaze Li, Aocheng Shen, Bing Liu, Boyu Zhang, Xiaoxuan Fan, Qiankun Zhang, Xianjun Deng

InteractBench: Benchmarking LLMs on Competitive Programming under Unrevealed Information

Read the original on arXiv AI →

InteractBench is a new benchmark that evaluates large language models on interactive competitive programming problems, where key information is revealed only through queries to an interactor. It contains 322 curated problems from Codeforces, AtCoder, IOI, and ICPC, each with executable local interactors for offline testing. The study finds that even top reasoning models struggle with these tasks, highlighting gaps in information acquisition, state tracking, and protocol adherence.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 24

Can LLMs Reason About Runtime Behavior? A Repository-Level Dynamic Benchmark

The paper introduces SWE-Flux, a repository‑level benchmark designed to test large language models’ ability to reason about runtime behavior. It contains 480 execution‑grounded instances from 12 real Python repositories, with gold answers automatically harvested from instrumented test executions. Evaluation of five LLMs shows the task remains difficult, with the best model achieving only 37% accuracy, and the benchmark can generate challenging variants through input perturbation.

By Hamed Taherkhani, Mohammad Abdollahi, Melika Sepidband, Hridya Dhulipala, Tien N. Nguyen, Hadi Hemmati
arXiv AI
Aug 13

VAKRA: Evaluating Multi-Hop Reasoning Across APIs and Retrieval Under Tool-Use Policies

arXiv:2608. 12282v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agents deployed in enterprise settings must reason across structured APIs and document collections, yet existing benchmarks evaluate these capabilities in isolation.

By Ankita Rajaram Naik, Anupama Murthi, Benjamin Elder, Siyu Huo, Raavi Gupta, Abhinav Jain, Praveen Venkateswaran, Abdulhamid Adebayo, Danish Contractor