arXiv:2608. 14747v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: WANDR (Wide ANd Deep Research) is a benchmark of 500 realistic, challenging data-collection tasks for research agents.
By Vitaliy Polshkov, Marcin Pitera, Jeremy Yang, Kirill Priemko, Maksim Gaiduk, Aleksandr Nikolenko, Denis Bykov, Clare Southern, Denis Yarats, Jerry Ma
arXiv:2607. 25891v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating AI agents in interactive environments is hindered by fragmented tasks, scaffolds, verifiers, and scoring rules.
By Stefan Krsteski, Charlotte Meyer, Guillaume Allegre, Tony O'Halloran, Alexandre Sallinen
arXiv:2606. 03305v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Benchmark contamination, where evaluation examples appear in a model's training data, threatens the validity of LLM assessment.
By Wojciech Zarzecki, Jan Dubi\'nski, Sebastian Cygert
arXiv:2606. 08036v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in academic research workflows, but scholarly tasks require high factual precision and therefore expose a key weakness: overconfidence.
By Zongrng Li, Mingzheng Yang, Lei Zou, Hongxu Ma, Hao Tian, Siqi Zhou, Wenjing Gong, Kaili Zhang, Bingqian Chen, Mitch Zhang, Yifan Yang
arXiv:2607. 05443v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scientists increasingly rely on open-source tools to support their research workflows, yet discovering relevant software among over 600 million GitHub repositories remains challenging.
By Nishan Pantha, Pranath Reddy Kumbam, Sajil Awale, Pushwitha Krishnappa, Muthukumaran Ramasubramanian, Nidhi Jha, Emily Foshee, Ankur Kumar, Rachel Slank, Ashkbiz Danehkar, Rahul Ramachandran
arXiv:2607. 24882v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern coding agents are usually evaluated by whether they eventually produce a correct patch, but patch generation depends on an earlier context-acquisition stage: finding the repository files needed for the task.
By Bowen Qin, Yi Xie