arXiv AI By Pegah Nokhiz, Aravinda Kanchana Ruwanpathirana, Helen Nissenbaum

Incoherent by Design? On the Moral Self-Consistency of LLMs

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2608. 15354v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLMs are increasingly used in morally sensitive contexts, yet it is unclear whether they apply ethical principles consistently across situations.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Jun 26

Radical AI Interpretability

arXiv:2606. 26523v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We develop a framework for interpreting AI systems as agents, drawing on the philosophical tradition of radical interpretation and the tools of mechanistic interpretability.

By Daniel A. Herrmann, Benjamin A. Levinstein
arXiv AI
Jul 10

Can We Trust LLM's Logic? Quantifying Uncertainty, Coherence, and Robustness via a Graph-Based Framework

arXiv:2607. 08017v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large-Language Models (LLMs) can be prone to flawed and unfaithful reasoning that decoding strategies like Self-Consistency (SC) fail to detect as they evaluate only final-answer agreement while ignoring the logical validity of intermediate steps.

By Riccardo Revalor, Jalees Rehman, Debjit Pal