arXiv AI By Fernando Martinez-Lopez, Tao Li, Yingdong Lu, Juntao Chen

In-Context Reinforcement Learning via Communicative World Models

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2508. 06659v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) agents often struggle to generalize to new tasks and contexts without updating their parameters, mainly because their learned representations and policies are overfit to the specifics of their training environments.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Jun 4

Contextual Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Reef Monitoring

arXiv:2604. 12645v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Although autonomous underwater vehicles promise the capability of marine ecosystem monitoring, their deployment is fundamentally limited by the difficulty of controlling vehicles under highly uncertain and non-stationary underwater dynamics.

By Melvin Laux, Yi-Ling Liu, Rina Alo, S\"oren T\"opper, Mariela De Lucas Alvarez, Frank Kirchner, Rebecca Adam
arXiv AI
Jul 15

In-Context Reinforcement Learning under Non-Stationarity: A Survey

arXiv:2607. 11906v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The development of decision-pretrained transformers, algorithm distillation, long-context meta-RL, and retrieval-augmented agents has renewed interest in in-context reinforcement learning (ICRL): the ability of a pretrained or fine-tuned decision model to infer latent task rules and improve future behavior from interaction context, without test-time parameter updates.

By A Run, Ziluo Ding
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 3

Quo Vadis, World Modeling?

Continually improving agents require dynamic interaction feedback beyond static supervision, yet direct real-environment interaction is costly, slow, unsafe, and hard to parallelize. World modeling offers a natural intermediate proxy that allows agents to query lower-cost, more controllable feedback before committing to real actions.

arXiv AI
Aug 5

Quo Vadis, World Modeling?

arXiv:2608. 02713v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Continually improving agents require dynamic interaction feedback beyond static supervision, yet direct real-environment interaction is costly, slow, unsafe, and hard to parallelize.

By Yu Yang, Xuemeng Yang, Licheng Wen, Lingdong Kong, Xiaobin Hu, Dongyue Lu, Wei Chow, Xiyan Huang, Yuxiang Feng, Yue Liao, Jianbiao Mei, Daocheng Fu, Rong Wu, Pinlong Cai, Ran Yi, Ying Tai, Jiangning Zhang, Botian Shi, Yong Liu, Shuicheng Yan