arXiv AI
Oct 16

CIM-Embed: Learning Instruction-Conditioned Multimodal Embeddings for Clustering

CIM-Embed is a framework that learns instruction‑conditioned multimodal embeddings for clustering. It uses supervised contrastive learning with same‑group positives and negatives from other groups, and handles tasks with varying group counts via heterogeneous structured batches. At inference, the model maps an object’s image, text, and instruction to an embedding, and HDBSCAN clusters these embeddings without requiring a pre‑specified cluster count. The authors introduce ProductMIC, a benchmark of 5,373 Amazon products and 449 grouping tasks, and report a mean per‑task V‑measure of 95.01, outperforming the best general‑purpose baseline.

By Yinghua Xu, Pengyang Xie, Yanxiang Zhou, Chuanzhi Tong, Xiao Xiao, Chaoqun Feng, Xiaoqing Wang
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 24

UVU: Improving Multimodal Understanding via Vision-Language Unified Autoregressive Paradigm

UVU is a vision-language unified autoregressive framework that integrates visual supervision directly into the pre-training stage of multimodal large language models. By using continuous visual encoding and a large-scale iterative hierarchical clustering algorithm to build a pixel-level visual codebook, UVU enables lossless representation of visual inputs and autoregressive generation of pixel-level image tokens alongside textual tokens. This approach synergizes pixel-level visual perception with semantic-level visual understanding, allowing models to internalize visual reconstruction capabilities and improve multimodal understanding performance.

By Zhehan Kan, Xinghua Jiang, Yubo Zhu, Yanlin Liu, Xiaochen Yang, Zhixiang Wei, Shifeng Liu, Qingmin Liao, Wenming Yang, Xin Li, Yinsong Liu, Deqiang Jiang, Xing Sun
arXiv AI
Jun 24

Evaluating the Interpretability of Sparse Autoencoders with Concept Annotations

arXiv:2606. 24716v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are increasingly used to extract interpretable concepts from vision and vision language models, yet existing evaluation methods largely rely on proxy metrics or qualitative inspection rather than measuring semantic correspondence.

By Jonas Klotz, Cassio F. Dantas, Pallavi Jain, Diego Marcos, Beg\"um Demir