arXiv AI
ICCU: In-Context Continual Unlearning via Pattern-Induced Refusal Rules
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 16
Behavioral Forgetting Is Not Privacy in Machine Unlearning
The paper argues that machine unlearning, which seeks to erase specific information from large language models, is often evaluated only on a single benchmark distribution, leading to an incomplete assessment of privacy. The authors demonstrate that forgetting can differ significantly when the same information is queried in different languages and scripts across multilingual models, revealing a gap between behavioral forgetting and true inaccessibility. They call for broader evaluation that includes access‑path generalization and adversarial recoverability to ensure genuine privacy protection.
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 30
UnlearningSoup: Is Repeated Tuning Necessary for Large Language Model Unlearning?
arXiv:2609.37076v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models trained on vast corpora inherently risk memorizing harmful content that may later re-emerge in their outputs. To mitigate this is...
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 13
Forget Narrowly, Retain Broadly: Unlearning as an Asymmetric Generalization Problem
arXiv:2607. 09236v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine unlearning in LLMs is the targeted removal of specific knowledge while preserving all other capabilities, critical for privacy and safety.
arXiv AI
Oct 1
Linguistic Loopholes in LLM Unlearning: From a 174-Language Benchmark to Coverage-Aware Unlearning
The paper introduces the problem of cross‑lingual loopholes in large language model (LLM) unlearning, where forgetting a fact in one language can leave it accessible in others. It presents a new 174‑language benchmark, the Cross‑Lingual Unlearning Tensor, and proposes COVER, a method that selects a subset of source languages to maximize unlearning coverage under a language budget. Experiments show COVER reduces residual knowledge by 7.8–27.3% compared to uniform selection and works on both synthetic and real low‑resource news data.
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 11
Probing for Knowledge Attribution in Large Language Models
The paper introduces a method for identifying the dominant knowledge source behind large language model (LLM) outputs, distinguishing between faithfulness violations (misuse of provided context) and factuality violations (errors in internal knowledge). A simple linear probe trained on hidden representations can reliably classify this source, and the authors present AttriWiki, a self‑supervised pipeline that generates labeled training data by prompting models to recall withheld entities or read them from context. Probes trained on AttriWiki achieve high Macro‑F1 scores across several models and datasets, generalize zero‑shot to a benchmark, and show that attribution mismatches can increase error rates by up to 70%. "whyItMatters":"The study demonstrates that knowing the source of an LLM’s answer is crucial for effective mitigation of hallucinations, as attribution mismatches significantly raise error rates."
arXiv AI
Oct 1
Mitigating Memorization In Language Models
The paper explores ways to reduce the memorization of training data in language models, testing three regularizer-based, three finetuning-based, and eleven machine unlearning methods—five of which are newly introduced. It introduces TinyMem, a lightweight suite of small models for rapid testing of these mitigation techniques, and shows that unlearning methods, particularly BalancedSubnet, outperform others in removing memorized content while maintaining task performance. The study also finds that regularizer-based approaches are slow and ineffective, while finetuning methods are costly, especially when high accuracy is required.