arXiv AI
Hypothesis-guided discovery of cognitive algorithms via program refinement
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jun 26
auto-psych: Automating the science of mind using agent-driven theory discovery and experimentation
arXiv:2606. 26460v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI-based scientific automation is increasingly possible by using agents to generate hypotheses, design experiments, and analyze data.
arXiv AI
Sep 3
Induction and Inquiry via Probabilistic Reasoning over Language and Code
The paper introduces a computational model that encodes symbolic knowledge as mental programs combining natural language and source code, and uses LLM-guided Bayesian learning to sequentially infer these programs. It demonstrates that this approach satisfies data‑efficiency, uncertainty handling, and flexibility, reproducing human inductive learning and active inquiry behaviors such as anchoring and garden‑pathing. In contrast, pure LLMs and classic Bayesian models either fail the task, do not match human behavior, or require prohibitive computational resources.
arXiv AI
Jun 10
Using Probabilistic Programs to Train Inductive Reasoning in Large Language Models
arXiv:2606. 09856v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Post-training Large Language Models (LLMs) for reasoning typically focuses on deductive tasks such as mathematics and coding where correctness is verifiable.
arXiv AI
Aug 25
Cognitive Profiling of LRMs' Reasoning Traces Using Bloom's Taxonomy
arXiv:2608.23205v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have revolutionized reasoning in LLMs, and the increasing public availability of reasoning traces creates valuable opport...
arXiv AI
Jun 24
ATHENA: Agentic Team for Hierarchical Evolutionary Numerical Algorithms
arXiv:2512. 03476v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Progress in computational science depends on complex numerical workflows that must faithfully encode physical laws, yet translating conceptual insight into reliable code remains a major bottleneck.
arXiv AI
Sep 3
Thinking effort aligns between humans and reasoning models in abductive reasoning
The study examines how the effort expended by large reasoning models (LRMs) compares to that of humans during abductive reasoning tasks. By analyzing reaction times and reasoning traces, the authors find that LRMs and humans exhibit similar patterns of effort and error types. They also demonstrate that decoding strategies allowing models to explore multiple reasoning paths further align the models’ reasoning costs with human effort.