arXiv AI
How To Train Your World Model: Fine-tuning vs RAG for LM-based World Modeling
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Sep 1
Retrieval-Augmented LLM Agents: Learning to Learn from Experience
arXiv:2603.18272v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While large language models (LLMs) have advanced the development of general-purpose agents, robust generalization to unseen tasks remains challengi...
arXiv AI
Jun 18
Improve Large Language Model Systems with User Logs
arXiv:2602. 06470v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Scaling training data and model parameters has long driven progress in large language models (LLMs), but this paradigm is increasingly constrained by the scarcity of high-quality data and diminishing returns from rising computational costs.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 8
Q2D-Web: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Retrieval in Agentic RAG Systems
Q2D-Web is a new large‑scale benchmark for agentic Retrieval‑Augmented Generation (RAG) systems, featuring a 190 million‑document web corpus and 70 k machine‑reformulated search queries in ten languages. It supplies three sets of relevance judgments—agent citations, production rankings, and a combined set enriched with LLM‑based labels—to evaluate first‑stage retrievers. Experiments on 13 retrievers show consistent ranking across judgment sets but significant variation across domains, languages, and query types, and demonstrate that a carefully sampled sub‑corpus can approximate full‑corpus evaluation with minimal loss in Recall@1000.
arXiv Computation and Language
5d ago
EVOKE: Eliciting World Knowledge in Agents for Transferable Decision-Making
arXiv:2609.38334v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as agents for multi-step decision-making, yet transfer poorly to unseen environments. World-mode...
arXiv AI
Sep 1
Look It Up: Analysing Internal Web Search Capabilities of Modern LLMs
The paper evaluates how modern large language models use internal web search to answer factual questions. Using 783 static queries and 288 dynamic queries, the authors find that enabling retrieval improves accuracy on static questions but hurts confidence calibration. On dynamic queries, models often retrieve but still achieve less than 70% accuracy, mainly due to poor query formulation and source selection, indicating that internal web search works better as a quick verification tool than a full information‑retrieval system.
arXiv AI
Sep 4
CoMAP: Co-Evolving World Models and Agent Policies for LLM Agents
CoMAP introduces a framework that jointly evolves textual world models and agent policies through a closed‑loop interaction. At each decision step the world model forecasts future state feedback for candidate actions, while the agent reflects on the reliability of this feedback to refine its action. The resulting on‑policy trajectories are used to self‑distill and update the world model, improving prediction accuracy and long‑horizon decision‑making across embodied planning, web navigation, and tool‑use benchmarks.