arXiv AI By Marty O'Neill

Grounded Inference: Principles for Deterministically Encapsulated Generative Models

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 19753v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The incorporation of generative models into traditional computational systems presents both enormous opportunity and tremendous peril.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 25

Neuro-symbolic AI for Industrial Configuration

The paper "Neuro-symbolic AI for Industrial Configuration" discusses how Large Language Models (LLMs) fall short for industrial product configuration due to their probabilistic nature, which conflicts with the need for syntactically valid, semantically consistent outputs that align with extensive feature and rule knowledge bases. It proposes Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI as a promising solution, outlining three integration strategies—hybrid inference, hybrid fine‑tuning, and hybrid training—and presents a taxonomy of these approaches. The authors describe their efforts to implement a NeSy-based configuration copilot, derive practical design choices for trustworthy AI deployment in engineering settings, and highlight key research challenges, especially scaling NeSy methods from academic prototypes to full‑scale industrial configurators.

By Danilo Valerio, Philipp Kogler, Stefan Bischof, Thomas Hubauer, Huzefa Rangwala
Mistral AI
Mar 17

Introducing Forge

Today, we’re introducing Forge, a system for enterprises to build frontier-grade AI models grounded in their proprietary knowledge.

arXiv AI
Sep 11

Context operations to architecture modelling output from large language models and evaluation criteria for their use in systems engineering design

The paper presents a framework of formal operations for assembling context in large language model (LLM)-based engineering design, involving modular context units such as policy prompts, reference units with persistence, and user questions with prompt vectoring. It also introduces a formal method for evaluating modelling-as-code LLM outputs, assessing compliance to intent from LLM answers and the support LLMs provide for systems architecture modelling.

By Vinicius Kaster Marini, Petter Krus