Generate in the Chart, Not on the Boundary: Function-Symbol Grounding for Hard Constraints in LTN-GANs
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2607. 16727v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autoregressive multimodal large language models (MLLMs) suffer from error snowballing: a single incorrect inference early in a chainof-thought (CoT) trace corrupts all downstream reasoning.
arXiv:2606. 09278v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models frequently hallucinate in precision-critical domains such as technical diagramming and mechanical design, where outputs must satisfy strict geometric constraints.
The paper introduces a neuro‑symbolic framework for scientific reasoning that separates symbolic validity and semantic groundedness. A deterministic symbolic verifier acts as a hard filter to guarantee syntactic and arithmetic correctness, while a Process Reward Model (PRM) is trained on verifier‑accepted steps to assess contextual grounding. The authors propose Counterfactual Symbolic Perturbation (CSP) to generate hard negative examples that pass the verifier but are logically flawed, enabling efficient PRM training and a verifier‑first constrained search at inference.
arXiv:2602.17493v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We develop a method for training neural networks on Boolean data in which the values at all nodes are strictly $\pm 1$, and the resulting mod...
arXiv:2603. 14147v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The generative artificial intelligence (AI) ecosystem is undergoing rapid transformations that threaten its sustainability.
arXiv:2603. 03538v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) using chain-of-thought reasoning have demonstrated great potential for solving complex reasoning and planning tasks.