Hugging Face Trending Papers July 30, 2026

From Minds to Models: The Intersection of Psychology and LLM Behaviours

Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →

Large language models (LLMs) are often compared with the human mind because their decision-making is complex, non-linear and difficult to interpret. Psychological methods developed to investigate unobservable mental processes may therefore help examine LLM behaviour, particularly in government and healthcare.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at Hugging Face Trending Papers.

arXiv AI

Jul 31

Identifying Implicit Bias in LLM-based Chat AI Toward People with Intellectual Disabilities

arXiv:2607. 26062v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Background: This work investigates the presence of implicit bias in Large Language Model (LLM)-based chat AI models directed toward people with intellectual disabilities (ID).

By Karly V. Coffey, Gloria L. Krahn, John P. Hanley, Jacob E. Neely

llms safety

arXiv AI

Jul 8

Prompt Robustness Is Task-Dependent: Comparing Objective and Belief-Style Questions in LLM Evaluation

arXiv:2607. 05554v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Survey-style evaluations of large language models often treat a prompted response as a measure of a model's values or beliefs.

By Sadia Kamal, Arefa Patwary, Anthony Marchiafava, Atriya Sen, Sagnik Ray Choudhury

llms benchmarks

arXiv AI

6d ago

Large Language Models Reproduce Racial Stereotypes When Used for Text Annotation

arXiv:2603. 13891v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for automated text annotation in tasks ranging from academic research to content moderation and hiring.

By Petter T\"ornberg

llms fine-tuning safety

arXiv AI

1d ago

Plausible but Not Valid: A Psychometric Audit of LLMs as Synthetic Survey Respondents

arXiv:2608. 14606v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as synthetic survey respondents, but existing evaluations ask whether answers look plausible at the individual level.

By Mantas Lukauskas, Viktorija \v{S}arkauskait\.e

llms benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jun 30

LLM Agents Grounded in Self-Reports Enable General-Purpose Simulation of Individuals

arXiv:2411. 10109v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Machine learning can predict human behavior well when substantial structured data are available for well-defined outcomes.

By Joon Sung Park, Carolyn Q. Zou, Jonne Kamphorst, Niles Egan, Aaron Shaw, Benjamin Mako Hill, Carrie Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris, Percy Liang, Robb Willer, Michael S. Bernstein

llms agents benchmarks

arXiv Machine Learning

Jun 5

Moral Sensitivity in LLMs: A Tiered Evaluation of Contextual Bias via Behavioral Profiling and Mechanistic Interpretability

arXiv:2605. 03217v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in settings that require nuanced ethical reasoning, yet existing bias evaluations treat model outputs as simply "biased" or "unbiased.

By Yash Aggarwal, Atmika Gorti, Vinija Jain, Aman Chadha, Krishnaprasad Thirunarayan, Manas Gaur

llms efficiency safety

Related stories

Identifying Implicit Bias in LLM-based Chat AI Toward People with Intellectual Disabilities

Prompt Robustness Is Task-Dependent: Comparing Objective and Belief-Style Questions in LLM Evaluation

Large Language Models Reproduce Racial Stereotypes When Used for Text Annotation

Plausible but Not Valid: A Psychometric Audit of LLMs as Synthetic Survey Respondents

LLM Agents Grounded in Self-Reports Enable General-Purpose Simulation of Individuals

Moral Sensitivity in LLMs: A Tiered Evaluation of Contextual Bias via Behavioral Profiling and Mechanistic Interpretability