arXiv AI By Chenyao Ma, Di Zhang, Weibo Gong, Wei Du, Rui Su, Yuhang Chen, Kan Xu, Huan Gu, Limin Li, Piao Ma, Zhenghao Li, Hao Li

From Materials Database to Materials Bank: Assetizing Data for AI Driven Materials Innovation

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 31366v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Driven by high-throughput experimentation, computational modeling, and artificial intelligence (AI), materials data has expanded at an unprecedented rate.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 27

Generative and multimodal AI for materials prediction and design: Progress, challenges, and perspectives

arXiv:2607. 21660v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is accelerating materials prediction and design by enabling efficient exploration of chemical and structural spaces, with particular promise for novel materials discovery.

By Xianyuan Liu, Charles Anjah, Benjamin E. Jolly, Jonathon F. S. Markanday, Joshua Berry, Haolin Wang, Nicola A. Morley, Robert D. J. Oliver, Alexandra J. Ramadan, Delvin Ce Zhang, Katerina A. Christofidou, Haiping Lu
arXiv AI
Jun 16

Can Artificial Intelligence Accelerate Technological Progress? Researchers' Perspectives on AI in Manufacturing and Materials Science

arXiv:2511. 14007v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) raises expectations of substantial increases in rates of technological progress, but such anticipations are often not connected to detailed ground-level studies of AI use in innovation processes.

By John P. Nelson, Olajide Olugbade, Philip Shapira, Justin B. Biddle
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 3

When Literature Data Mislead Artificial Intelligence in Materials Discovery

The article examines how scientific literature, often used as a data source for AI in materials science, can contain hidden inaccuracies such as text-figure mismatches, ambiguous axis labels, unit inconsistencies, and missing measurement context. By tracing solid electrolyte conductivity values from original papers to curated datasets, the authors uncover recurrent errors that are numerically plausible yet hard to detect, leading to significant label noise in AI models. A cross-database example demonstrates that ambiguous reporting can cause a 100‑fold error in conductivity values, underscoring the need for traceable reporting, rigorous curation, and validation practices in AI-driven discovery.

By Qian Wang, Ying Li, Ryuhei Sato, Hidemi Kato, Shin-ichi Orimo, Hao Li, Eric Jianfeng Cheng