arXiv AI By Philipp Steigerwald, Jens Albrecht

From "Help" to Helpful: A Hierarchical Assessment of LLMs in Mental e-Health Applications

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2602. 18443v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Psychosocial online counselling frequently encounters generic subject lines that impede efficient case prioritisation.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

Roleplaying with Structure: Synthetic Therapist-Client Conversation Generation from Questionnaires

arXiv:2510.25384v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are promising tools for synthetic data generation in mental health. However, privacy policies and restrictions forced...

By Doan Nam Long Vu, Rui Tan, Lena Moench, Svenja Jule Francke, Daniel Woiwod, Florian Thomas-Odenthal, Sanna Stroth, Tilo Kircher, Christiane Hermann, Udo Dannlowski, Hamidreza Jamalabadi, Simone Balloccu, Shaoxiong Ji
arXiv AI
Jun 24

One Year Later...The Harms Persist, But So Do We!

arXiv:2606. 23884v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: General-purpose large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for mental health-related conversations, yet safety safeguards remain inadequate and inconsistent across clinical conditions.

By Annika Marie Schoene, Cansu Canca, Gautham Vijay Kumar, Anson Antony
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

HealthBench-Psych: A Mental Health Subset of OpenAI's HealthBench

HealthBench-Psych is a mental‑health subset of the OpenAI HealthBench benchmark, created by filtering 5,000 physician‑rubric conversations for mental‑health relevance using an LLM‑applied rubric and validating the selection through two rounds of blinded clinician review. The resulting 610 conversations (12.2 % of the corpus) are released along with a pipeline, model responses, grades, and analysis code. Evaluation of 20 frontier and open models by a cross‑vendor panel of three LLM judges shows a statistically tied frontier cluster, measurable refusal behavior in two models, and near‑identical rankings across judges (τ ≥ 0.92).

By Matthew Flathers, Phuong Anh Nguyen, Jill Noorily, Julian Herpertz, Meiting Chen, Jasreen Multani, Samuel Powell, Mason Granof, Mark Kalinch, John Torous