arXiv AI
From Detection to Refusal: Safer LLMs via Circuit-Guided Weight Scaling
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Aug 24
RefusalGuard: Geometry-Preserving Fine-Tuning for Safety in LLMs
arXiv:2605.01913v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Fine-tuning safety-aligned language models for downstream tasks often leads to substantial degradation of refusal behavior, making models vul...
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 13
Optimizing Against Safety Representations: Activation-Guided Adversarial Suffixes and the Geometry of Refusal
arXiv:2607. 08883v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Behavioral alignment in large language models often masks fragile internal safety representations.
arXiv AI
Aug 17
Tripwire: Triggering Aligned Refusal via Statistically Certified Safety Neurons
arXiv:2608. 14392v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neuron- and path-level interventions offer the finest-grained route to defending large language models (LLMs) against jailbreak attacks, yet existing methods fall short of this promise, i.
arXiv AI
Jul 23
Defense Against LLM Backdoors using Critical Neuron Isolation Pruning
arXiv:2607. 19894v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where hidden triggers induce malicious outputs.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 22
Defense Against LLM Backdoors using Critical Neuron Isolation Pruning
Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where hidden triggers induce malicious outputs. Existing defenses generally fall into inference-time detection or training-time mitigation, but face two key limitations.
arXiv AI
Jun 6
Safety Paradox: How Enhanced Safety Awareness Leaves LLMs Vulnerable to Posterior Attack
arXiv:2606. 05614v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are rigorously aligned to refuse harmful requests, a process that inherently cultivates a latent capacity to evaluate and recognize unsafe content.