arXiv Machine Learning June 29, 2026 By Javal Vyas, Milapji Singh Gill, Artan Markaj, Felix Gehlhoff, Mehmet Mercang\"oz

From Detection to Action: Using LLM Agents for Fault-Tolerant Control

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2606. 28011v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose an agentic Large Language Model (LLM) framework for active Fault-Tolerant Control (FTC) that transforms fault detection outputs into constraint-aware recovery actions grounded in plant-specific knowledge.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI

Jul 1

A Tutorial on Autonomous Fault-Tolerant Control Using Knowledge-Grounded LLM Agents

arXiv:2606. 31635v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Fault recovery in process plants still relies heavily on plant operators, especially when faults fall outside predefined supervisory logic.

By Javal Vyas, Milapji Singh Gill, Artan Markaj, Felix Gehlhoff, Mehmet Mercang\"oz

llms agents safety

arXiv AI

Jul 14

Closed-Loop Control with Rule-Aligned Small Language Models and Multi-Agent Self-Correction

arXiv:2607. 09713v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A key step toward autonomous industrial operation is the ability to create and reconfigure control policies from natural-language requirement specifications, with minimal or no manual redesign.

By Yuchen Wang, Javal Vyas, Tong Liu, Mehmet Mercangoz

llms agents efficiency safety

arXiv Machine Learning

Jul 1

A Systematic Approach to Multi-Agent AI from Advanced Regulatory Control Theory: Safe and Auditable LLM Operator Agents for Process Control

arXiv:2606. 30877v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent literature shows that large language models (LLMs) are useful for general-purpose tasks yet perform poorly on specific domain ones.

By Idelfonso B. R. Nogueira, Sigurd Skogestad

llms agents safety

arXiv AI

Aug 12

A Methodology for Selecting and Composing Runtime Architecture Patterns for Production LLM Agents

arXiv:2605. 20173v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Production LLM agents combine stochastic model outputs with deterministic software systems, yet the boundary between the two is rarely treated as a first-class architectural object.

By Vasundra Srinivasan

llms agents

arXiv AI

Jun 6

When Tools Fail: Benchmarking Dynamic Replanning and Anomaly Recovery in LLM Agents

arXiv:2606. 05806v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing benchmarks evaluate Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR) in LLMs on idealized ''happy paths'', largely overlooking real-world tool failures.

By Dongsheng Zhu, Xuchen Ma, Yucheng Shen, Xiang Li, Yukun Zhao, Shuaiqiang Wang, Lingyong Yan, Dawei Yin

llms agents benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jul 14

AgentAbstain: Do LLM Agents Know When Not to Act?

arXiv:2607. 10059v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent systems based on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed for autonomous tasks, yet existing evaluations mostly focus on task success rather than whether agents know when to abstain.

By Xun Liu, Yi Evie Zhang, Vira Kasprova, Parisa Rabbani, Pardis Sadat Zahraei, Tianyu Zhang, Ali Ebrahimpour-Boroojeny, Varun Chandrasekaran

llms agents benchmarks

Related stories

A Tutorial on Autonomous Fault-Tolerant Control Using Knowledge-Grounded LLM Agents

Closed-Loop Control with Rule-Aligned Small Language Models and Multi-Agent Self-Correction

A Systematic Approach to Multi-Agent AI from Advanced Regulatory Control Theory: Safe and Auditable LLM Operator Agents for Process Control

A Methodology for Selecting and Composing Runtime Architecture Patterns for Production LLM Agents

When Tools Fail: Benchmarking Dynamic Replanning and Anomaly Recovery in LLM Agents

AgentAbstain: Do LLM Agents Know When Not to Act?