arXiv AI By Louis Schiekiera, Max Zimmer, Christophe Roux, Sebastian Pokutta, Fritz G\"unther

From Associations to Activations: Comparing Behavioral and Hidden-State Semantic Geometry in LLMs

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

The information geometry of large language models is shared, learned, and controllable

The paper investigates how large language models (LLMs) share a common Fisher‑Rao geometry in their next‑token probability distributions, revealing that behaviour largely determines this geometry while activation geometry depends on coordinate choices. Across transformer, state‑space, and recurrent architectures, output geometries align more closely than activation geometries, and this shared structure facilitates semantic‑category transfer and improves agreement with human word choices as models scale and train. The study further demonstrates that geometry can guide minimum‑disturbance interventions, enabling reusable control that preserves behaviour better than Euclidean methods and enhances steering, editing, attribution, dictionary learning, and fine‑tuning.

By Dario Picozzi
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 23

Meaning Contracts: Local Semantic Geometry in Large Language Models

The paper investigates how semantic meaning is arranged locally within large language models. By using two controlled probes—one cross‑lingual and one refinement probe—on four decoder‑only LLMs, it finds that after removing dominant variance directions, sentence pairs rank by semantic relatedness, semantic factors cluster around an invariant core with structured variation, refinement tightens neighborhoods, and sentence‑level versus token‑local readouts reveal complementary geometric patterns. These results suggest that LLM semantics form local anisotropic neighborhoods that contract when meaning is refined.

By Andr\'es Daniel Godoy Ortiz
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22

Comparing Latent Concept Formation in State Space Models and Transformers via Sparse Autoencoders

The paper compares latent representations in Selective State Space Models (SSMs) like Mamba and Transformers such as Pythia using Sparse Autoencoders. Across a 10‑million token corpus, 99.98% of Mamba features align closely with Pythia’s, supporting the Universality Hypothesis that core semantic representations are similar across architectures. A tiny 0.02% of features diverge, with Mamba’s recurrent bottleneck causing it to compress syntactic anomalies into polysemantic neurons, whereas Pythia’s attention can isolate distinct formatting edge‑cases.

By Rithin Nagaraj, Rupa Laalasa Oruganti, Prerna Subhashchandra Kunder, Ashwini M Joshi