The study investigates how autonomous coding agents interact with technical documentation, analyzing 557 coding sessions and 33,097 pull requests. Findings reveal that agents primarily engage with agent-facing artefacts, show weak links between documentation consultation and code editing, lack explicit validation sequences, and tend to consult documentation after code changes. The authors propose a two‑lobed cycle model of agent‑documentation interaction and challenge assumptions about actionability and verifiability of agent‑friendly documentation.
arXiv:2608. 10037v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on external tools to accomplish complex real-world tasks, making tool documentation a critical grounding resource for LLM agents.
By You Lu, Kun Zhang, Bihuan Chen, Xin Peng
arXiv:2608.29204v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Generative AI-based software engineering agents are becoming routine contributors to real-world software projects. On GitHub, developers can assign t...
By Jonan Richards, Kosei Horikawa, Youmei Fan, Yutaro Kashiwa, Mairieli Wessel
arXiv:2606. 13468v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI coding agents are increasingly used to generate pull requests (PRs) that propose code fixes in software projects.
By Mahmoud Abujadallah, Ali Arabat, Mohammed Sayagh
arXiv:2606. 09090v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Developers increasingly provide AI coding assistants with persistent context through configuration files such as CLAUDE.
By Christoph Treude, Sebastian Baltes
arXiv:2606. 13449v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI-agents (e.
By Ali Arabat, Mohammed Sayagh