arXiv AI
FORALL-LEAN-AGENT for Auditable Reasoning in Formal Mathematics and Software Verification
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jun 16
SorryDB: Can AI Provers Complete Real-World Lean Theorems?
arXiv:2603. 02668v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We present SorryDB, a dynamically-updating benchmark of open Lean tasks drawn from 78 real world formalization projects on GitHub.
arXiv AI
Jul 1
Beyond the Library: An Agentic Framework for Autoformalizing Research Mathematics
arXiv:2606. 31134v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in mathematical reasoning, they frequently produce subtle errors that evade human detection.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 13
Vero: Can AI Agents Build Formally Verified Software Repositories?
AI agents are increasingly used for programming, but do not provide any guarantee on the correctness of generated code. Verified code generation, in which an agent produces both an implementation and a machine-checked proof of its specification, offers a stronger path toward trustworthy AI-generated software.
arXiv AI
Jul 1
Beyond Compilation: Evaluating Faithful Natural-Language-to-Lean Statement Formalization
arXiv:2606. 31002v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Theorem-proving benchmarks evaluate proof search against fixed formal statements, but natural-language-to-Lean formalization must generate the formal statement itself.
arXiv AI
Aug 14
Vero: Can AI Agents Build Formally Verified Software Repositories?
arXiv:2608. 13522v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI agents are increasingly used for programming, but do not provide any guarantee on the correctness of generated code.
arXiv AI
Sep 12
Magenta: Closing the Loop Between Mathematical Reasoning and Lean Verification
Magenta is a training‑free pipeline that bridges informal natural‑language mathematical problems and formal Lean 4 verification. Given a problem in plain text, it generates an answer, translates it into a Lean 4 statement, and constructs a machine‑checked proof. The system includes a statement judge to ensure the formalisation matches the original problem and an error‑attribution judge to guide corrections, achieving perfect accuracy on olympiad benchmarks and solving all six IMO 2026 problems when combined with K2‑Horizon‑7B.