arXiv:2603. 00910v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Layer-wise capacity in large language models is highly non-uniform: some layers contribute disproportionately to loss reduction, whereas others are nearly redundant.
By Theophilus Amaefuna, Hitesh Vaidya, Anshuman Chhabra, Ankur Mali
arXiv:2608. 01624v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Adapting a language model to a task no longer requires training all of its weights, and a line of parameter-efficient methods has driven the trainable count from billions down to a handful of scalars.
By Taeyeong Kim, Ahhyun Kim, TaeHyeon Kim, Unggi Lee
arXiv:2607. 05300v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Parameter-efficient fine-tuning still leaves a broad space of behavior-changing updates reachable, so a poisoned objective can be represented and optimized.
By Fabien Polly
The paper introduces Activation Boundary Matching for Low‑Rank Adaptation (ABM‑LoRA), a task‑informed initialization strategy that uses the signs of layer‑wise pre‑activations from a brief probe adapter as targets for a fresh adapter. By training with a margin‑based hinge objective on these activation boundaries, ABM‑LoRA captures useful adaptation directions that standard LoRA initializers miss, while requiring only a few forward passes. Experiments show that ABM‑LoRA outperforms or matches existing LoRA, SVD, and gradient‑based initializers across multiple models and benchmarks, including T5‑base/GLUE, ConvNeXt‑T, Swin‑T, Qwen2.5‑1.5B, and LLaMA2‑7B.
By Dongha Lee, Jinhee Park, Minjun Kim, Junseok Kwon
Parameter-efficient fine-tuning still leaves a broad space of behavior-changing updates reachable, so a poisoned objective can be represented and optimized. We study an alternative: adaptation constrained to the subspace estimated from a trusted pool of existing task adapters.
COEC (Calibrated Orthogonal-Equivalence Compensation) is a training‑free framework that improves structured pruning of large language models by applying alternating left and right orthogonal rotations to the retained weight matrix. The method optimizes the right rotation on a reduced Stiefel manifold, rescales singular values via generalized cross‑validation, tempers the calibration Gram matrix, and adds an alignment penalty to preserve geometric relations between attention projections. Experiments on Llama‑3, Llama‑3.1, and Qwen2.5 show that COEC consistently improves perplexity and zero‑shot accuracy across multiple sparsity levels, outperforming existing compensation techniques.
By Peiqi Yu, Nam Ling, Wei Wang, Wei Jiang